Mar 20

Flower

Fifteenth donation in 2016.

Infinite Unknown reader D.W. donated $5 (monthly donation).

Thank you for your continuing support!

* * *

Donations in March: $30, £25, $10 (AUD)

Donations in February: $245, £25

Donations in January: $85, £25

* * *

Donations in 2016: $360, £75, $10 (AUD)

* * *

PayPal: Donate in USD
PayPal: Donate in EUR
PayPal: Donate in GBP

Tags:

4 Responses to “Donation”

  1. squodgy Says:

    Now this is making more sense that the extremes of pessimism & optimism trotted out monotonously by the so called clever people, who look blankly at you when you ask why your investment didn’t perform.

    http://news.gold-eagle.com/article/gold-forecast-2021-stealth-bull-market/120

  2. squodgy Says:

    http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2016.htm

  3. squodgy Says:

    Food for thought.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHm0XhtDyZA

  4. squodgy Says:

    Follow on….from Jim Stone…

    FINAL ANSWER: I watched the video of the Russian plane crash. It was nose dived into the runway in perfectly clear weather at 500 plus mph, PERIOD, END OF DISCUSSION. see for yourself here and the question is, why are they lying about this? The debris field has only a couple pieces bigger than a football and is spread out for over a mile. That does not happen at controlled landing speeds as Russia claimed, EVER.

    UPDATE: I suspected it was on fire in the first video, and a new video from a different angle seems to confirm it. It was definitely at least in a free fall which could have been caused by a stall (if it was not in a full on dive,) and if it was in a free fall because of a stall, I do not think the stall was pilot error, I think the plane was disabled and on fire. Free fall speed would be less than 500 mph but a lot faster than landing speed. I think this plane was probably shot down or brought down by something else and the Russians do not want to admit it.
    KEY INFO: In the forums and blogs, trolls on every thread and comment section everywhere were saying it was a crappy old plane and it crashed because it fell apart. But it was built in 2011 and just went through a major inspection shortly before this crash, so why would the trolls lie about the age of this aircraft and shred the credibility of the plane itself? We all know what a troll’s job is, why did they take this approach with a plane that was, by aviation standards brand new and also built by a great company? I say it is because they know the official story is a lie and want to side swipe public commentary and legitimate discourse.

Leave a Reply