Jan 16

Flashback:

- Ron Paul (Highlights From Nov. 22, 2011 Debate): ‘If You Have A No-Fly Zone Over Syria That Is An Act Of War!’ – ‘What If We Had China Put A No-Fly Zone Over The US?’ (Video)

- Flashback: Hillary Clinton (March 27, 2011): ‘There’s a different leader in Syria now. Many of the members of Congress of both parties who have gone to Syria in recent months have said they believe he’s a reformer.’

- U.S. General Wesley Clark (Ret.) (Video), explains that the Bush Administration planned to take out 7 countries in 5 years:

Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran.

War with Russia anybody?

- Large Russian Naval Flotilla Docks In Syria

- Russian Military Chief Warns NATO: ‘Under Certain Conditions Local And Regional Conflicts May Develop Into A Full-Scale War Involving Nuclear Weapons’

Syria and Iran do not have a Rothschild controlled/owned central bank:

- The Real Target … US Wants To ‘Close Down The Central Bank Of Iran’: Senior U.S. Official

And the ‘war’ with Iran has already started:

- Ron Paul: Sanctions Against Iran Are an ‘Act of War’:

Paul said that Iran would be justified in responding to sanctions by blocking the Straits of Hormuz, adding that the country blocking the strategically important strait is “so logical” since they have no other recourse.

He then compared the situation to China blocking off the Gulf of Mexico to trade.


- Russia Says NATO, Persian Gulf Nations Plan to Seek No-Fly Zone for Syria (Bloomberg, Jan 12, 2012):

Russia received information that members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and some Persian Gulf countries are preparing military intervention in Syria, the head of the Russian Security Council said.

Turkey, a NATO member, may play a key role, Nikolai Patrushev, who used to head the country’s intelligence agency, the Federal Security Service, told Interfax in comments confirmed by his office. The U.S. and Turkey are working on a possible no-fly zone to protect Syrian rebels, Patrushev said.

“We are receiving information that NATO members and some Persian Gulf states, working under the ‘Libyan scenario’, intend to move from indirect intervention in Syria to direct military intervention,” the Russian security chief said.

Continue reading »

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Dec 31

See also:

- ’2012: The Year That Could Bring A US Strike Of Iran’ (Haaretz) = WW III

- US Aircraft Carrier ‘Spotted’ Inside Iran Wargame Zone

- China To Protect Iran Even If It Means World War III



A handout picture from US Navy dated February 21, 2007, shows the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis as it conducts operations in the Gulf (AFP Photo / US Navy / Ronald Reeves)

- Imperial overdrive: Red alert over Iran (RT, Dec. 30, 2011):

2011 will be remembered as the year the US, Britain, France and Israel went into Imperial Overdrive in North Africa and the Middle East. Will 2012 be remembered as the year those same Western Allies unleashed World War III?

­It is not news anymore to say that the West will soon attack Iran, maybe Syria. They have been threatening to do that for years now, certainly ever since the failed Israeli invasion into Southern Lebanon in mid-2006, when they were routed by Hezbollah.

So what is different today? For starters, general circumstances have changed dramatically in the Region. Genuine popular dissent inside key Muslim countries has been used by the Western Allies to train, fund and arm local criminal and terrorist organizations, dubbed “freedom fighters”, as their proxies.

Country after country has fallen victim to the CIA’s, MI6’s and Mossad’s “dirty tricks departments”, and other Western-style terrorist organizations. Results range from moderate “regime change” in Tunisia and Algeria; via horrendous “violence by our boys” in Egypt, Yemen and Bahrain; all the way to outright military attack, civil war and political assassination. Such as the one in Libya, where Hillary Clinton boisterously laughed when she learned Muammar Gaddafi had been murdered live on TV by “her thugs”.

The whole region has been set on fire. Not that other regions of the world are not on fire too; however the pyrotechnics used by the Global Power Elite vary in nature in each geography. For example, Europe, the US and Britain are being set alight using financial terrorism resembling a neutron bomb, which kills people off while leaving assets and banks standing.

Continue reading »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dec 23

- The Globalization of War: The “Military Roadmap” to World War III (Global Research, Dec. 18, 2011)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dec 04

- Pakistan military ordered to return fire if attacked by Nato forces (Guardian, Dec. 2, 2011)

Tags: , , , , , ,

Dec 02

Related info:

- Dr. Webster Tarpley: The NATO-CIA Destabilization Of Syria Is Under Way! (Video)


- Pakistan Border Troops Free to Retaliate If Attacked, Dawn Says (Bloomberg, Dec 2, 2011):

Pakistan’s army chief, General Parvez Ashfaq Kayani, has told his troops they can respond to any future attacks by NATO or U.S. forces without waiting for orders from senior officers, the Dawn newspaper reported.

Kayani directed his soldiers to retaliate against any act of aggression with full force regardless of the cost and consequences, the report said, citing a message drafted by Kayani for troops. NATO helicopters based in Afghanistan killed 24 Pakistani soldiers in an attack on border posts Nov. 25. The U.S.-led force is investigating the incident.

- Pak army chief gives ‘full liberty’ to troops to retaliate future NATO attacks (Times of India, Dec 2, 2011):

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Army chief Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani has given his troops “full liberty” to respond to any further cross-border attacks by NATO forces in Afghanistan in the wake of an air strike that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers, according to official sources.

The powerful army chief told commanders of units deployed along the western border with Afghanistan that they had “full liberty of action to respond (by) employing all capabilities” available at their disposal, the sources said.

Kayani was quoted by the sources as saying that there should be “no ambiguity in the rules of engagement for everyone down the chain of command” if they faced an attack by NATO forces.

Such an action would “require no clearance at any level” and the army would “provide resources as required on ground”, he was quoted as saying.

Following Saturday’s air strike on two military border posts in Mohmand Agency that killed 24 soldiers, Pakistan closed all NATO supply routes and asked the US to vacate Shamsi airbase, reportedly used by CIA-operated drones.

Pakistan also decided to boycott the Bonn Conference on Afghanistan to protest the attack.

The sources said Kayani had described the NATO attack as a “blatant act of aggression” that was “unacceptable”.

The army chief said he had issued directions that “any act of aggression” would be responded to with “full force, regardless of the cost and consequences”.

- Pakistan to retaliate future NATO raids (Press TV, Dec 2, 2011):

Pakistani top military official has ordered the country’s army to respond firmly to any future act of aggression following the NATO airstrikes that killed 24 Pakistani troops over the weekend, Press TV reports.

Pakistan’s Army Chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani said on Thursday that Pakistani troops will counter any attack on the country’s soil with full force.

He also ordered the Pakistani army to make the necessary arrangements for retaliatory measures, and told them not to wait for any orders from the government to give a crushing response to the aggressors, disregarding the potential consequences.

NATO helicopters and fighter jets attacked two military border posts in northwest Pakistan on November 26, killing two dozen Pakistani troops.

Enraged by the attack, Pakistan closed the border crossings that the Western military alliance uses to transfer fuel and other supplies for foreign forces into landlocked Afghanistan. It also called on the United States to vacate Shamsi Air Base in Balochistan province.

The US military reportedly uses the remote desert outpost as a hub to launch assassination drone attacks in Pakistan’s tribal areas. Pakistan had previously told the United States to leave the controversial airbase in June.

Furthermore, Pakistan announced it would not participate in an international conference on Afghanistan in Germany next week in a show of anger over the deadly NATO strike.

Meanwhile, the Islamabad government warned on Thursday that it could withdraw its support for the US-led war on terrorism if Pakistan’s sovereignty is violated again.

“Enough is enough. The government will not tolerate any incident of spilling even a single drop of any civilian or soldier’s blood,” Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar told a Senate committee on foreign affairs.

“Pakistan’s role in the war on terror must not be overlooked,” she noted.

Germany’s  ‘Handelsblatt’ writes:

Google translate:

Pakistan Threatens NATO With Retaliation (Handelsblatt/DPA, Dec 2, 2011):

Pakistan has threatened after the accidental attack on a Pakistani post of NATO retaliation. In case of repetition units are likely to return fire, senior military officials are quoted as saying.

IslamabadNach the NATO bombardment of Pakistani military posts, the army leadership of the country threatened the international forces for the case of recurrence, according to a media report about retribution. Army chief Ashfaq Parvez Kayani was the commanders in the region bordering Afghanistan granted permission to respond in the event of a renewed NATO attack the fire, reported the newspaper “Express Tribune” on Friday, citing senior military circles. At the NATO attack in the Mohmand tribal region last Saturday, 24 Pakistani soldiers were killed.

According to a military expert quoted by the newspaper, the directive means that local commanders can independently respond to “enemy movements” on Pakistani territory, without having to consult a higher office must.

The attack by U.S. helicopters on the military post has burdened the tense relations between Pakistan and the USA massively. In protest against the incident Islamabad has canceled his participation in the Afghanistan conference in Bonn next Monday. In addition, the government has cut the key supply route for NATO troops in Afghanistan through Pakistan and prompted the U.S. Army to vacate an air base in the southwest of the country.

Original arcticle:

- Pakistan droht Nato mit Vergeltung (Handelsblatt/DPA, Dec 2, 2011):

Pakistan hat nach dem versehentlichen Angriff auf einen pakistanischen Posten der Nato mit Vergeltung gedroht. Im Wiederholungsfall dürften die Einheiten das Feuer erwidern, werden ranghohe Militärs zitiert.

IslamabadNach dem Nato-Beschuss pakistanischer Militärposten hat die Armeeführung des Landes den internationalen Truppen für den Wiederholungsfall einem Medienbericht zufolge mit Vergeltungsmaßnahmen gedroht. Armeechef Ashfaq Parvez Kayani habe den Kommandeuren im Grenzgebiet zu Afghanistan die Erlaubnis erteilt, im Fall eines erneuten Nato-Angriffs das Feuer zu erwidern, berichtete die Zeitung „Express Tribune“ am Freitag unter Berufung auf ranghohe Militärkreise. Bei dem Nato-Angriff im Stammesgebiet Mohmand waren vergangenen Samstag 24 pakistanische Soldaten getötet worden.

Nach Ansicht eines von der Zeitung zitierten Militärexperten bedeutet die Direktive, dass die örtlichen Kommandeure selbstständig auf „feindliche Bewegungen“ auf pakistanischem Staatsgebiet reagieren können, ohne vorher eine höhere Dienststelle konsultieren zu müssen.

Der Angriff von US-Hubschraubern auf den Militärposten hat die angespannten Beziehungen zwischen Pakistan und den USA weiter massiv belastet. Aus Protest gegen den Vorfall hat Islamabad seine Teilnahme an der Afghanistan-Konferenz am kommenden Montag in Bonn abgesagt. Zudem hat die Regierung die wichtige Nachschubroute für die Nato-Truppen in Afghanistan durch Pakistan gekappt und die US-Armee aufgefordert, eine Luftwaffenbasis im Südwesten des Landes zu räumen.

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Dec 01

See also:

- Bomb Voyage: 600 Libyans ‘Already Fighting In Syria’ (RT)

- US Carrier Strike Force Enters Syrian Waters

- Russia Warships To Enter Syria Waters To Stop NATO



YouTube Added: 29.11.2011


YouTube Added: 29.11.2011

Description:

On the Tuesday, November 29 edition of the Alex Jones Show, Alex talks about moves by the globalists to attack Syria as France trains “rebels” in Turkey and the Russians deny they have dispatched war ships to guard their interests in the Middle Eastern country. Historian and author Webster Tarpley talks with Alex about Syria, Iran and Pakistan.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Nov 28

China says it is ‘deeply shocked’ by Pakistani soldiers’ deaths, as Afghan and Nato officials again say they came under fire first


Pakistan’s ally China says it is ‘deeply shocked’ by a cross-border attack by Nato forces in Afghanistan that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers Link to this video

- China Supports Pakistan In Row Over NATO Border Attack (Guardian, Nov. 28, 2011):

China has stepped into the toxic diplomatic dispute between Pakistan and the United States, expressing its “deep shock and strong concern” over the deaths of Pakistani soldiers bombarded by Nato helicopters at a border post.

The intervention by the Chinese foreign ministry comes at a time when relations between the US and Pakistan are at their most strained for many years. It is being seen as a move by Beijing to strengthen its already close ties with Islamabad in the wake of Saturday’s air attack in which 24 Pakistani soldiers died.

The prime minister of Pakistan, Yousaf Raza Gilani, has threatened to “revisit” engagement with Nato following the deaths at the Mohmand border post, the deadliest such incident since the start of the Afghan war in 2001. “Business as usual will not be there,” Gilani told CNN .

Continue reading »

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Nov 28

- Pakistan permanently closes borders to Nato after air strike (Telegraph, Nov. 28, 2011):

Pakistan has permanently closed its borders to Nato convoys supplying international troops in Afghanistan, according to the country’s interior minister, following an air strike that killed 24 soldiers at the weekend.

The announcement came as the Pakistan army claimed the attack lasted almost two hours and continued even after commanders at the bases pleaded with coalition forces to stop.

Closing the crossings will choke off almost half of all supplies destined for the Nato-led force — including British troops.

Continue reading »

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Nov 28

- Nato ‘ignored plea to stop attacks’ (Press Association, Nov. 28, 2011):

The Nato air strikes that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers went on for almost two hours and continued even after Pakistani commanders had pleaded with coalition forces to stop, the army has claimed.

Nato has apologised for the deaths in Saturday’s incident and promised a full investigation.

Continue reading »

Tags: , , , , , ,

Nov 24

Full must watch address to the public: for English closed captioning hit the CC button.

YouTube Added: 23.11.2011

- Russia Retaliates Against US: Puts Radar Station On Combat Alert, Prepares To Take Out European Missile Defense Systems (ZeroHedge, Nov. 23, 2011):

Earlier today, we presented the latest developments in the escalating possibility of an imminent air (and potentially land) campaign targeting Syria by the “western world”, a move that would infuriate not only Iran, but also Russia and China, both of which have made it clear they would not sit idly by and let such an “aggression” stand. Now it is Russia’s turn to retaliate. Cutting straight to the chase – in a nationally televized appearance by Russian president Dmitry Medvedev: in response to what the Russian believes is an active incursion and a potential act of eventual aggression on behalf of NATO countries in Eastern Europe (and hence the US), he he said the following (7 minutes in): “First, I am instructing the Defense Ministry to immediately put the missile attack early warning radar station in Kaliningrad on combat alert. Second, protective cover of Russia’s strategic nuclear weapons, will be reinforced as a priority measure under the programme to develop out air and space defenses. Third, the new strategic ballistic missiles commissioned by the Strategic Missile Forces and the Navy will be equipped with advanced missile defense penetration systems and new highly-effective warheads. Fourth, I have instructed the Armed Forces to draw up measures for disabling missile defense system data and guidance systems if need beFifth, if the above measures prove insufficient, the Russian Federation will deploy modern offensive weapon systems in the west and south of the country, ensuring our ability to take out any part of the US missile defense system, in Europe. One step in this process will be to deploy Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad Region. Other measures to counter the European missile defense system will be drawn up and implemented as necessary. Furthermore, if the situation continues to develop not in Russia’s favor we reserve the right to discontinue further disarmament and arms control measures. Besides, given the intrinsic link between strategic offensive and defensive arms, conditions for our withdrawal from the New START Treaty could also arise.” That said, he concludes that Russia is still open to dialog. However, if Obama merely intends to bomb any nation at will, we are very much concerned that everything Medvedev has just threatened will be enacted. And exponentially more so when Putin comes back in charge. One thing is certain – Russia is not North Korea, and taking this speech for more empty jawboning is probably not the wisest option.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,