Beginning in 2003, software engineer William Connolley quietly removed the highly inconvenient references to the global cooling scare of the 1970s from Wikipedia, the world’s most influential and accessed informational source.
It had to be done. Too many skeptics were (correctly) pointing out that the scientific “consensus” during the 1960s and 1970s was that the Earth had been cooling for decades, and that nascent theorizing regarding the potential for a CO2-induced global warming were still questionable and uncertain. Continue reading »
More CO2 would actually help the planet , says Professor William Happer of Princeton University.
* * *
… and global warming????
Just look at atmospheric CO2 and average global temperatures:
Carbon dioxide emissions are making the Earth greener and more fertile, a United Nations (UN) climate scientist has said.
In a paper for the Global Warming Policy Foundation, Dr Indur Goklany, who has previously represented the United States on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), says that the rising level of carbon dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere “is currently net beneficial for both humanity and the biosphere generally”.
The benefits are real, whereas the costs of warming are uncertain,” he adds. Continue reading »
…. but NOT because of CO2. Take a look at average global temperatures and atmospheric CO2 …
Here’s the reason for the “global freeze” …
HUGE parts of the USA and Europe, including Britain will be exposed to freezing temperatures if the Atlantic Ocean Current continues to weaken.
A shock study has revealed the current is weakening and is at risk of collapsing. If it does, temperatures in parts of Europe could become almost unbearably cold.
The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current (AMOC) carries heat from the equator northwards, partially contributing to the heat of northern Europe’s climate.
However, while previous studies had found it is not affected by a spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide, new research suggests otherwise.
A study published in the journal Science Advances has found the AMOC will shut down if it is continually exposed to doubled atmospheric carbon dioxide over a prolonged period. Continue reading »
Michael DePinto from Right Wing Conspirator interviews David DuByne from ADAPT 2030 on the political events around the world and how it relates to the new grand solar minimum. From population migration, to currency devaluation , proxy wars and saber rattling, its all a grand plan to control the masses when food shortages rock our planet in 2018-2019.
LINK TO THIS STORY:
Michael DePinto’s Website: https://www.thelastgreatstand.com
LINKS TO ALL SLIDES IN THE INTERVIEW AND SEVERAL EXTRAS
Considering that we’re living in a time when news outlets on both sides of the political spectrum are screaming “fake news” about anything and everything written or said by anyone other than themselves, this article and the video before it will come as fantastic news for anyone looking to retire their status as a “climate denier” for good.
If the whole “climate change” debate wasn’t so dishonest, so corrupt, and so fraudulent, once you finally find out where the numbers liberals have been throwing at you for years actually come from, you’d probably die of laughter. Unfortunately, when you consider how many hard working Americans Al Gore must have stolen from to become a billionaire based on a perpetual lie, it becomes less funny. Continue reading »
James Lovelock, inventor of Gaia Theory and godfather of the modern environmental movement, has finally renounced the green religion.
Climate alarmism, he says, is not “remotely scientific”; one volcano could make more difference to global warming than humans ever could; the computer models are “unreliable”; greens have behaved “deplorably”; and anyone who tries to “predict more than five to ten years is a bit of an idiot.” Continue reading »
In other words, not far from zero.
CO2 is very nearly 0% of the atmosphere
“Deniers” need to start attacking the fairy tale more aggressively, at the roots.
By Ray Kraft
How can a trivial 1 part per 10,000 increase in a trace gas (from 0.03% to 0.04%) cause any detectable, distinguishable, change in the climate? It makes no sense.
The world has fallen for the classical sophomoric fallacy that correlation = causation.
And then it’s invented all kinds of computerized climate change models to prove it. Continue reading »
And CO2 levels were higher than today throughout almost all of history.
When you look at the above chart, you will see almost no correlation between atmospheric CO2 levels and temperature.
“The Late Carboniferous to Early Permian (315 mya — 270 mya) is the only time period in the last 600 million years when both atmospheric CO2 and temperatures were as low as they are today (Quaternary Period).
“Compared to former geologic times, our present atmosphere, like the Late Carboniferous atmosphere, is CO2- impoverished!” Continue reading »
Atmospheric CO2 levels have been declining for the last 500 million years, since the beginning of the Cambrian Period.
“By 250 Mya the planet had buried most of the free atmospheric carbon and the atmosphere looked much as it does today,” says long-time reader Duster.
“Then came the Permian extinction. Atmospheric carbon recovered over the next 100 million years reaching about half of the early Phanerozoic level before resuming its downward trend to the present.
“There is literally no significant correlation of temperature and CO2 over the Phanerozoic. Continue reading »
Could impoverish the world
4 Jun 2016 – Decarbonizing the globe could have devastating consequences on the world’s way of life, warns M.J. Kelly, a University of Cambridge engineering professor.
CO2 brings immense benefits
“So-called “greenhouse gas effect” of CO2 does not exist at all!’
– Dr. Klaus L.E. Kaiser
Carbon Pollution” Claptrap
Carbon (as in wood, coal, oil, natural gas) is an energy source — not a pollutant
By Dr. Klaus L.E. Kaiser
When will the governments (and their all too numerous “useful idiots” of the media) state the unadulterated truth to the people? Continue reading »
“Our flustered activity will do nothing to alter CO2 concentrations, any more than it could cause the satellites of Jupiter to become bigger or smaller.”
– Société de Calcul Mathématique, SA
Yesterday I posted excerpts from a white paper issued by the Paris-based Société de Calcul Mathématique, SA.
Here are a few more excerpts from that paper: Continue reading »
Scientist Piers Corbyn doesn’t mince words when explaining what all that hot air about global warming and man-made climate change is about. “Follow the money,” he says.
Corbyn is the brother of the Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn and a scientist and long-term weather forecaster. He thinks we are all getting too hot under the collar about the issue, and he explains why in a three-minute clip.
While world leaders and corporate representatives meet in Paris during the COP21 with the intention of passing a new set of mandatory regulations which signatory members will have to abide by, Corbyn explains that not one single independent study shows that human activity is the sole or the strongest cause of global warming. Continue reading »
More doublespeak. Burning fossil fuels and cutting down trees causes global COOLING, new NASA study finds.
Fossil fuel burning gives of aerosols which reflect sunlight.
Environmentalists have long argued the burning of fossil fuels is responsible for global warming and predicted temperature increases because of the high levels of carbon dioxide produced – which causes the global greenhouse effect. Continue reading »
“A word-salad of delusional nonsense.”
Piers Corbyn and WeatherAction comment on the #COP21 Climate “Deal”:
“It is a pack of lies, a word-salad of delusional nonsense. It is not science but politics and we challenge David Shukman of BBC and Sir David Attenborough to public debate on their claims and to answer the points made by us and all scientists at the Paris Climate Challenge alternative to UN IPCC held 1-3Dec – http://www.PCC15.org
I. THE FACTS OBSERVED IN THE REAL WORLD, rather than the product of failed models by the self-serving appointees of governments which make-up the IPCC process ARE:
(i) ALL the predictions of the ‘Global Warming’ theory of the UNIPCC have failed.
Real world temperatures as accurately measured by satellites are not rising but falling while the UN-IPCC models based on ‘cretin-Physics’ predicted rising for decades.
Arctic sea ice has now INCREASED to record levels not fallen as required under the UN IPCC model. Continue reading »
An international team of scientists have stunned attendees at the UN’s climate change conference in Paris recently by debunking claims that global warming is man-made.
The scientists say that while the science refutes the UN’s claim that man-made carbon emissions are to blame for global warming, they claim that the UN is pressing ahead with its sinister ‘climate regime’ agenda, which includes: destroying industrial civilization, propping up kleptocrats with Western tax funds, and seizing control of the global economy under the guise of regulating the immensely beneficial “gas of life,” also known as carbon dioxide.
– In Paris, Scientists Debunk UN “Climate” Hysteria (The New American):
PARIS — Amid United Nations efforts to shackle humanity to a UN “climate regime” at the COP21 global-warming summit, an international team of scientists and experts from various fields debunked the hysteria at a separate conference in Paris for realists. Essentially, the prestigious scientists said, there is no man-made global-warming crisis. The UN’s “climate” efforts, meanwhile, have a much more sinister agenda: Destroying industrial civilization, propping up kleptocrats with Western tax funds, and seizing control of the global economy under the guise of regulating the immensely beneficial “gas of life,” also known as carbon dioxide. The top U.S. senator on the Environment Committee also offered a message of hope to climate realists, saying the “climate charade” by the UN and the Obama administration was dead on arrival. Continue reading »
Outstanding American scientist denounces COP21 and the Plot against the Developing Countries
NASA Meteorologist and member of the Johnson Space Center Climate Group (Ret.), Tom Wysmuller was interviewed in New York by Celestin Ngoa Balla for the weekly Cameroon newspaper Journal Integration.
Mr Wysmuller: When did you start investigating the global climate change phenomenon and what evidence do you have to convince our readers of the seriousness, of the rigour of your work? Continue reading »
“If it is unchanged according to the father of the CO2-driven global warming hypothesis- 400 ppm in 1910 and 400 ppm now – why do we have any alarm ?” – Rosco Mac
“The science of climate change is unforgiving, no matter what the deniers may say,” screams Hillary. “Sea levels are rising; ice caps are melting; storms, droughts and wildfires are wreaking havoc.” consequences.”
“This would be a great comedy script if it weren’t serious,” says reader Rosco Mac. Continue reading »
– God Sent Snow to Obama’s Global Warming Fieldtrip (The Christian Post, Sep 9, 2015):
“Study the past if you would divine the future.” – Confucius
President Obama told some whoppers the size of Mt. McKinley, I mean Denali, about global warming while he was here in Alaska.
At a climate change conference in Anchorage Obama attempted to scare the long-johns off Alaskans he obviously thinks are stupid when he predicted “submerged countries, abandoned cities … entire industries of people who can’t practice their livelihoods, desperate refugees seeking the sanctuary of nations not their own, and political disruptions that could trigger multiple conflicts around the globe.” Continue reading »
Commentary by Jim Stone:
Global warming scam imploding . . .
The following graphs are not from a single ground station, they are from a satellite relay station in Puerto Casado, where satellites relayed composite global data back to Earth (for the later portion of the graphs). The left of the graph has the average global temperature in degrees celsius.
This is what Al Dork tried to push:
And this is what really happened:
Both graphs quoted the same data. However, the top graph is a lie, which intentionally misrepresented the data. You were not delusional. It really has been cold.
– Top scientists start to examine fiddled global warming figures (Telegraph, April 25, 2015):
The Global Warming Policy Foundation has enlisted an international team of five distinguished scientists to carry out a full inquiry
Last month, we are told, the world enjoyed “its hottest March since records began in 1880”. This year, according to “US government scientists”, already bids to outrank 2014 as “the hottest ever”. The figures from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) were based, like all the other three official surface temperature records on which the world’s scientists and politicians rely, on data compiled from a network of weather stations by NOAA’s Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN). Continue reading »
– Where is the carbon offset money going?” – Short video (Ice Age Now, Oct 22, 2014):
“We have been robbed. Or future generations have been destroyed.”
“The Carbon Rush is an epic documentary,” says reader Norm Smith. “It exposes carbon credit schemes and carbon-offset programs as nothing less than crimes against humanity.”
“This 2 minute youtube trailer gives a small sample of the atrocities and the horrors. It freaked me out. Please take a peek.”
Thanks to Norm Smith for this video
– Plants Absorbing More CO2 Than We Thought (Ice Age Now, Oct 17, 2014):
Climate models “have grossly underestimated the power of our plants,”says this article on Nature World News.
The models “failed to take into account that when carbon dioxide (CO2) builds up in the atmosphere, plants actually thrive, become larger, and are able to soak up more CO2.”
According to a new study, carbon acts like a fertilizer that accelerates plants growth. Continue reading »
– How many of the thousands of newly discovered volcanoes are pumping vast amounts of HEAT into the ocean? (Ice Age Now, Oct 7, 2014):
One also wonders “How many of these newly found thousands of volcanic seamounts are producing CO2 that bubble into the ocean?” – Meteorologist Anthony Watts
A newly created new map of the world’s seafloor shows thousands of previously uncharted mountains rising from the bottom of the ocean.
Most of these underwater mountains, known as seamounts, were once active volcanoes. Continue reading »
Originally broadcasted March 8, 2007 on British Channel 4.
A documentary, by British television producer Martin Durkin, which argues against the virtually unchallenged consensus that global warming is man-made. A statement from the makers of this film asserts that the scientific theory of anthropogenic global warming could very well be “the biggest scam of modern times.”
H/t reader squodgy:
“The Rothschilds AGAIN…..”
Dr. David M.W. Evans consulted full time for the Australian Greenhouse Office (now the Department of Climate Change) from 1999 to 2005, and part time 2008 to 2010, modeling Australia’s carbon in plants, debris, mulch, soils, and forestry and agricultural products. Evans is a mathematician and engineer, with six university degrees including a PhD from Stanford University in electrical engineering. The area of human endeavor with the most experience and sophistication in dealing with feedbacks and analyzing complex systems is electrical engineering, and the most crucial and disputed aspects of understanding the climate system are the feedbacks. The evidence supporting the idea that CO2 emissions were the main cause of global warming reversed itself from 1998 to 2006, causing Evans to move from being a warmist to a skeptic.
– The Skeptic’s Case (Ludwig von Mises Institute, Feb 24, 2012):
We check the main predictions of the climate models against the best and latest data. Fortunately the climate models got all their major predictions wrong. Why? Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message. Here it is, put simply enough for any lay reader willing to pay attention. Continue reading »
– Warnings about ocean acidification are completely misleading – and deliberately so (Ice Age Now, Aug 09, 2014):
“No honest chemist would claim the dissolving of the entire atmospheric mass of CO2 at once would make much difference to the pH of the oceans.”– Rosco Mac
Warnings about ocean acidification are completely misleading – and deliberately so
By Rosco Mac
Firstly, carbon dioxide in water is a very weak acid, whilst the ocean is a very stable buffer with a pH averaging around 8. The concentration of enough CO2 to significantly reduce that pH will not come from the atmosphere – there isn’t enough CO2 in the atmosphere to make much difference.
The mass of the oceans is 268 times the mass of the atmosphere
I can say this with confidence because the mass of the oceans is 268 times the mass of the atmosphere, and CO2 is currently only 0.04% of that.
No honest chemist would claim the dissolving of the entire atmospheric mass of CO2 at once would make much difference to the pH of the oceans.
Secondly, it is well known that an increase in temperature will reduce the solubility of CO2 in water. (The oceans are known as a carbon sink. When they’re cold, they absorb CO2 from the atmosphere. When they warm, they release CO2 into the atmosphere. ed)
Warm up a carbonated drink and see what happens
Warm water naturally contains less CO2 than cold water. Warm up a carbonated drink and see what happens – the CO2 comes out of solution.
The oceans are outgassing CO2 due to the slight warming trend observed. The cause of this trend IS NOT known !
I find alarmists stunningly contradictory and amusing.
They point out the slight increasing trend in temperatures as alarming !
They point out the side effect of this slight increasing trend in temperatures – rising sea levels – as alarming !
Then they claim man’s CO2 emissions will increase ocean acidification as alarming.
But you simply cannot have it both ways – that is an “Inconvenient Truth” !!
Either the oceans are getting warmer and the CO2 concentration in seawater is decreasing – which means that ocean acidification by manmade CO2 from the atmosphere is complete BS !!
– or –
The manmade CO2 from the atmosphere IS dissolving in cooler oceans causing ocean acidification – which means that warming oceans and the associated sea level rises are BS !!
Take your pick – REAL SCIENCE says you can’t have both.
– The idea that man controls CO2 is “delusional nonsense,” says astrophysicist (Ice Age Now, Aug 6, 2014):
Video – “Satellite data shows clearly that for the last ten years temperatures have been falling,” says Piers Corbyn.
Astrophysicist Piers Corbyn on “The Myth of Man-Made Global Warming”
Piers Corbyn has received international acclaim for the accuracy of his long-range climate forecasts. Although we hear daily of a scientific consensus to the contrary, what does Piers make of mankind’s alleged role in affecting the climate on Earth?
Piers presented at the recent Electric Universe conference in Albuquerque New Mexico, which featured investigators from wide ranging disciplines who had come to a common conclusion. Namely, that the key to understanding so-called climate change is the electromagnetic connection between Earth and the Sun.
Here are some of the highlights of his talk.
“Carbon dioxide does not drive climate,” says Piers. “Rather, temperature changes in the oceans, in the long run, drive carbon dioxide levels.”
“There is no actual evidence for the CO2 theory. Termites emit ten times more CO2 than man. The idea that termites, or cows, or whatever you have, are going to hold still while man does his thing is completely absurd. The idea that man controls CO2 is actually delusional nonsense.”
“Climate has changed for millions of years. The only thing that’s different now is that man is claiming he’s doing it.”
What drives our climate? asks Piers. “Solar activity.”
When you’ve got periods of low solar activity, like now, two things happen. One thing is that the jet stream on average goes farther south, and the other is that it swings more wildly north to south. And that means we get much bigger extremes in temperature.
Central to Piers predictions is the recognition that the sun and earth are connected electromagnetically.
– Apollo Astronaut: Climate Alarmism Is the ‘Biggest Fraud in the Field of Science’ (CNS News, July 2, 2014):
Climate alarmism is “the biggest fraud in the field of science” and the 97% consensus claim is nonsensical, Apollo 7 astronaut Walter Cunningham tells MRCTV in a preview of his presentation at the upcoming Heartland Institute climate conference, July 7-9.
“Since about 2000, I looked farther and farther into it,” Col. Cunningham (USMC, Ret.) tells MRCTV in an exclusive interview. “I found that not one of the claims that the alarmists were making out there had any bearings, whatsoever. And, so, it was kind of a no-brainer to come to the conclusion.”
Cunningham rejects the notion of man-made climate, not only as fact – but also as even qualifying as an actual “theory”:
“In the media, it was being called a theory. Obviously, they didn’t know what it means to be a theory.”
“If we go back to the warmist hypothesis – not a theory, but, a hypothesis – they’ve been saying from the very beginning that carbon dioxide levels are abnormally high, that higher levels of carbon dioxide are bad for humans, and they thought warmer temperatures are bad for our world, and they thought we were able to override natural forces to control the earth’s temperature. So, as I’ve looked into those, that’s the problem that I’ve found, because I didn’t find any of those to be correct – and, they certainly were not a theory, it was just their guess at what they wanted to see in the data they were looking at.”
Cunningham urges Americans to look at the data and decide for themselves, instead of taking anyone else’s word for it: Continue reading »
– The IPCC’s Latest Report Deliberately Excludes And Misrepresents Important Climate Science (Forbes, March 31, 2014):
This week, the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is releasing its latest report, the “Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report.” Like its past reports, this one predicts apocalyptic consequences if mankind fails to give the UN the power to tax and regulate fossil fuels and subsidize and mandate the use of alternative fuels. But happily, an international group of scientists I have been privileged to work with has conducted an independent review of IPCC’s past and new reports, along with the climate science they deliberately exclude or misrepresent.
– Global warming debunked: NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere (Natural News, Aug 22, 2013):
Practically everything you have been told by the mainstream scientific community and the media about the alleged detriments of greenhouse gases, and particularly carbon dioxide, appears to be false, according to new data compiled by NASA’s Langley Research Center. As it turns out, all those atmospheric greenhouse gases that Al Gore and all the other global warming hoaxers have long claimed are overheating and destroying our planet are actually cooling it, based on the latest evidence.
As reported by Principia Scientific International (PSI), Martin Mlynczak and his colleagues over at NASA tracked infrared emissions from the earth’s upper atmosphere during and following a recent solar storm that took place between March 8-10. What they found was that the vast majority of energy released from the sun during this immense coronal mass ejection (CME) was reflected back up into space rather than deposited into earth’s lower atmosphere.
The result was an overall cooling effect that completely contradicts claims made by NASA’s own climatology division that greenhouse gases are a cause of global warming. As illustrated by data collected using Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER), both carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), which are abundant in the earth’s upper atmosphere, greenhouse gases reflect heating energy rather than absorb it.
“Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” says James Russell from Hampton University, who was one of the lead investigators for the groundbreaking SABER study. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”
Almost all ‘heating’ radiation generated by sun is blocked from entering lower atmosphere by CO2
– Solar Cycle 24 Freezes Out Al Gore (Veterans Today, July 15, 2013):
Al Gore promotes Global Warming because it is a money making scam, these past winters are freezing out Global Warming as a viable theory. Al Gore is now frozen in time as the village idiot who lectured us about carbon emissions and was stopped by the cold reality of a cooling earth. So what was Anthropocentric Global Warming (AGW) all about anyways?
Global Warming was a Marketing Ploy
The Global Warming theory was never really a theory, it was a marketing effort on part of the “globalists” to remake the world in their image of taxing ever more, you breath so therefore you are taxed. The church invented guilt for the same reason. Al Gore was their errand boy, CO2 was never a threat because it is a trace gas, and man made CO2 only a small 3% of the total. Water vapor is 95% of the global warming effect, and is hardly ever mentioned.
Global Warming by increasing anthropocentric Carbon Dioxide isn’t true in the real world, yet in DC tinsel town (a special kind of la la land) where an endless celebration of spending someone else’s money has created its own reality. Washington is a giddy simulacrum of make believe and laws because we can, and anything we say goes because we are the Gods on the Potomac. The AGW has-been theory is still going like the pink Energizer bunny even after full exposure as a boldfaced hoax.
Does man made CO2 drive warming? No. It does absolutely nothing. One chart is all you need, CO2 is a trace gas in the atmosphere and the human caused portion of total greenhouse gases is only 0.117% of the total, thus man made CO2 has negligible effect on earth climate. Pay no attention to the media whores and their carbon scare tactics, ANTHROPOCENTRIC CO2 DOES ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Continue reading »
– Obama’s Climate Change Speech: Closed to the Public, Open to Activists (National Journal, June 25, 2013):
President Obama’s big climate speech on Tuesday is closed to the public — depending on your definition of public.
Several special-interest representatives were invited to the closed-door speech, including Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club; Gene Karpinski, president of the League of Conservation Voters; Christine McEntee, executive director of the American Geophysical Union; and Michael Bradley, executive director of the Clean Energy Group, a consortium of clean-burning utilities.
In response to a question about the speech being closed to the public, a senior White House official said Obama “will deliver remarks before several hundred stakeholders active in leading the efforts to address climate change by reducing carbon pollution, including business leaders, environmental organizations, faith leaders, scientists, and students.”
Global warming is a scam. (Links are down below.)
Real scientists predict a GLOBAL COOLING period (from 50 to up to 250 years).
The elitists know that the world is cooling and here is the Bilderberg group’s discussion agenda from 2010:
– Global Cooling and the New World Order (Telegraph):
“The 58th Bilderberg Meeting will be held in Sitges, Spain 3 – 6 June 2010. The Conference will deal mainly with Financial Reform, Security, Cyber Technology, Energy, Pakistan, Afghanistan, World Food Problem, Global Cooling, Social Networking, Medical Science, EU-US relations.”
Yep, that’s right. Global Cooling.
Always ‘follow the money’:
– Al Gore could become world’s first carbon billionaire (Telegraph):
on the political right and among global warming scepticsscientists and even more scientists, say Mr. Gore is poised to become the world’s first “carbon billionaire,” profiteering from government policies he supports that would direct billions of dollars to the business ventures he has invested in.
– Al Gore Lied (Veterans Today, June 28, 2013):
NASA – CO2 is a Global Coolant
… by Bob Nichols
[Editors Note: Armand Hammer of Occidental Petroleum (Hammer’s wikipedia has remained cleaned of his espionage history, despite it’s being out over a decade now. You can guess why) was the financial and political mentor for both Senator Gores. So they hold the honor of having a top Soviet spy as a patron. Hammer’s much advertised early Soviet business ventures (all of which lost money) were a cover for his espionage venture.
This was finally revealed when Prof. Harvey Klehr of Emory University here in Atlanta in his book, Venona, Decoding Soviet Espionage in America. The proof came from the Soviet archives when Yeltsin had them open for a few years. I was fortunate to spend an afternoon with him around ten years ago shooting two one hour Jim Dean Journals, one of them on Venona…and hoping to get this up on the Net some day… Jim W. Dean]
(San Francisco) The United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) lowers the Boom on Al Gore’s Big Lie that the humble, beneficial gas – CO2 – causes global warming. NASA states absolutely that Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is a Global Coolant and massively cools the Earth.
You can bet that the NASA scientists designed, built, launched and placed in Earth orbit the satellite machinery to prove it, too.
So, there we have it. In addition, the Earth has not gotten any warmer for 17 years. NASA has finally pulled the plug on Gore’s Big Lie and ended the gigantic, world wide charade on CO2.
This “discovery” about CO2 is nothing new, it’s well known by scientists not employed by the Gore-istas. The Gore-istas probably know it, too; but the money was just too good to pass up. Besides, you don’t have to do anything except sit around, make up wild stories and tell lies. Great “job” if you like that sort of thing.
Why did Gore do it?
– Al Gore backlash: Why environmentalists are celebrating rising CO2 levels (Natural News, June 2, 2013):
Thank goodness carbon dioxide levels are finally rising ever so slightly in our atmosphere, bringing much-needed carbon dioxide to the plants and forests of the world which have been starving for CO2. The lack of CO2 in the atmosphere is one of the most devastating limiting factors for plant growth and reforestation of the planet, and at just 400ppm — that’s just 400 micrograms per kilogram — carbon dioxide is so low that Earth’s plant life can barely breathe.
Editor’s note: I have added substantially to this story since it was first published in order to attempt to educate what appear to be a mass of brainwashed, mathematically illiterate commenters on Facebook who demonstrate a wholesale inability to process information with anything resembling rationality on this subject.
Let me clarify three things before we even get into the story: Continue reading »
– Nuclear Is NOT a Low-Carbon Source of Energy (ZeroHedge, April 14, 2013):
Why Do People Claim that Nuclear Power is a Low-Carbon Source of Energy?
Even well-known, well-intentioned scientists sometimes push bad ideas. For example, well-known scientists considered pouring soot over the Arctic in the 1970s to help melt the ice – in order to prevent another ice age. That would have been stupid. Even Obama’s top science adviser – John Holdren – warned in the 1970′s of a new ice age … and is open to shooting soot into the upper atmosphere. That might be equally stupid.
– CO2 myth busted: Why we need more carbon dioxide to grow food and forests (Natural News, March 1, 2013):
If you talk to the global warming crowd, carbon dioxide — CO2 — is the enemy of mankind. Any and all creation of CO2 is bad for the planet, we’re told, and its production must be strictly limited in order to save the world.
But what if that wasn’t true? What if CO2 were actually a planet-saving nutrient that could multiply food production rates and feed the world more nutritious, healthy plants?
CO2 is a vital nutrient for food crops
As it turns out, CO2 is desperately needed by food crops, and right now there is a severe shortage of CO2 on the planet compared to what would be optimum for plants. Greenhouse operators are actually buying carbon dioxide and injecting it into their greenhouses in order to maximize plant growth.
The science on this is irrefutable. As just one example, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food says: