See also:
- The Oil and Gas Industry’s 800-Pound Gorilla: RADIATION!
- ‘Fracking’ Result (= Contamination) For UK Shale Gas Will Be Kept Secret Until 2015
- US: Natural Gas Wells’ Contaminated Water Hits Rivers
- GASLAND Trailer 2010 (Documentary)
Tags: Agriculture, Chemicals, Contamination, Environment, Fracking, Global News, Hydraulic Fracturing, Pollution, Radiation, Water
Amazon.com: 63 Documents the Government Doesn’t Want You to Read
Amazon.de: 63 Documents the Government Doesn’t Want You to Read
Introduction: Jesse Ventura is the former Independent Governor of Minnesota. He is also a former U.S. Navy SEAL, professional wrestler, movie actor, a visiting fellow at Harvard Kennedy School of Government, and the New York Times bestselling author of five books. He is currently the host and executive producer of TruTV’s Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura. He has a reputation as the ultimate non-partisan truth-seeker; he has no qualms about questioning authority. Daily Bell: Thanks for sitting down with us. You’ve written another very interesting book, “63 Documents the Government Doesn’t Want You To Read.” Tell us about it.
Jesse Ventura: This is a book I collaborated on with Dick Russell, and I would like to give him the credit for doing all the research. That’s why we make a good team. I just don’t have the patience to do the research he does. It was our publisher, SkyHorse – it was their idea to do this book. Dick and I started searching for these documents, which are all documents released by the US government. WikiLeaks started releasing information right before we started, so naturally we used some of their stuff too. We started by going back to World War II, and we picked out 63 documents that we thought were very important. We choose 63 because that was the same year that President John F. Kennedy was murdered. That was when everything went bad. If you can murder the president and get away with it, you can do anything.
Daily Bell: Do you use original sources?
Jesse Ventura: Absolutely. The documents are original, not opinion. We reprinted the documents, so the reader has the ability to read all of them.
Daily Bell: What was the most shocking thing you learned.
Tags: 9/11, Alaska, Assassination, Bush administration, Chemicals, China, CIA, Constitution, Corporations, Crime, Cuba, Defense Department, Dollar, Economy, False flag, Fed, Federal Reserve, Fluor, Fluoridation, Fluoride, Food, Fourth Amendment, George Bush, Global News, Government, Gulf of Tonkin, HAARP, Hugo Chavez, Iraq, Jesse Ventura, John F. Kennedy, Law, Lyme Disease, Military, Mind-Control, Nazi Germany, Nazis, New World Order, Operation Northwoods, Patriot Act, Pentagon, Plum Island, Politics, Prozac, Quantitative Easing, Syphilis, Technology, Terrorism, Thomas Jefferson, U.S., War, warrantless wiretapping program, WIKILEAKS
See also:
- ‘Fracking’ Result (= Contamination) For UK Shale Gas Will Be Kept Secret Until 2015
- US: Natural Gas Wells’ Contaminated Water Hits Rivers
- GASLAND Trailer 2010 (Documentary) (Must-see!)
An odd sort of perfect storm – involving a high-profile New York Times energy series, a quirky documentary that just missed the Oscar and federal BP-spill recovery plans – may finally address the 800-pound gorilla of our nation’s energy policy: RADIATION.
The NYT series launched Sunday (Feb. 27) with detailed accounts of radioactive wastewater, created by a Halliburton-developed extraction process called “fracking,” being dumped with impunity across the country. The article even included a “smoking gun” document, a “confidential industry study” from 1990 by none other than the American Petroleum Institute. The API’s secret study concluded that even with conservative assumptions, the radium in drilling wastewater dumped off the Louisiana coast posed “potentially significant risks” of cancer for anyone eating fish from those areas. I’m working on my own series of posts about this hazard in the Gulf of Mexico.
Meanwhile, it seems the regulators have taken steps to make sure no real regulating takes place despite laws on the books to prevent this disaster in the making. Remember, ounce for ounce, radioactive materials are the most toxic substances known to man. The current scientific consensus postulates that there is no known safe level of exposure to radioactive materials and that any exposure above background increases the risk of cancer.
The NYT story might leave the impression that we have no laws governing industry’s radioactive assault – but we actually do. The laws are on the books. They’re just being broken, and ignored. Many of the “regulators” are industry hacks waiting for the revolving door to come around. They have no incentive to tighten the screws on the way Big Oil and Gas do business. In fact, having seen it first-hand, regulators who do try to engage in true regulating frequently are forced out of their jobs or denied promotions.
Into that context we also have the landmark documentary “GasLand,” which features comments from my clients, increased its already high profile with an Adademy Award nomination. “GasLand” focuses on the gas-extraction process called “fracking,” and how it’s contaminating drinking-water sources across the country with radiation.
Tags: Chemicals, Documentary, Economy, Environment, Gas, Government, Halliburton, Health, Law, Politics, Radiation, Society, U.S., Water
For your (dis)information only.
Part 1:
Part 2:
Part 3:
See also:
- Chemtrails: The List of Patents For Stratosperic Arial Spraying Programs!
- G. Edward Griffin on Chemtrails in Exclusive Interview
- The New World Order Poisoning Your Rain Water:
The rain water was tested by government labs:
Aluminum (780 times over the save level.)
Arsenic (593 times over the save level.)
Manganese (4000 times over the save level.)
Barium (300 times over the save level.)
Zinc (8000 times over the save level.)
Iron (2000 times over the save level.)
Boron (4000 times over the save level.)
- German Scientist Exposes Chemtrails As Military Operations
Tags: Airlines, Barium, Chemicals, Chemtrails, CIA, DARPA, FBI, FSB, Global News, Government, Israel, John F. Kennedy, Military, Missiles, NSA, Nuclear weapons, Politics, Project Clover Leaf, Richard Nixon, Russia, Scalar Weapon, Society, Technology, Tesla, Tom Bearden, U.S.
A frog floats with cranberries awaiting harvest on a cranberry bog in Wareham, Massachusetts Photograph: Charles Krupa/AP
For the last two decades, strange things have been happening to frogs. Some frog populations have high rates of limb deformities, while others have high incidences of what is known as “intersex” — traits associated with both males and females, such as male frogs whose testes contain eggs.
David K. Skelly, professor of ecology at the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, set out to discover what was causing these deformities, which some researchers were attributing to the use of an agricultural pesticide called atrazine. Skelly launched an experiment in ponds throughout Connecticut, studying frogs in four landscapes: forests, agricultural areas, suburbs, and cities. And what he found was surprising — the highest rates of deformities were not occurring in and around farmlands, but in cities and suburbs.
Tags: Atrazine, BPA, Chemicals, DDT, Environment, Frogs, infertility, Pesticides, Pollution, Science
(NaturalNews) The “caramel coloring” used to color all the top cola brands isn’t natural caramel coloring at all. Instead, it’s made by reacting sugars with ammonia and sulfites at high temperatures. This reaction results in the formation of 2-methylimidazole and 4-methylimidazole, both of which are chemicals documented by the U.S. government to cause cancer in mammals.
This is all coming to light thanks to an effort by the CSPI, which has now filed a regulatory petition to ban these chemicals from colas (http://www.cspinet.org/new/20110216…).
The National Toxicology Program has conducted animal studies on these toxic chemicals found in colas, concluding there is “clear evidence” that 2-MI and 4-MI are animal carcinogens.
The call to ban these chemicals from use in foods was joined by five carcinogenesis experts who said, “The American public should not be exposed to whatsoever as a result of consuming such chemicals, especially when they serve a non-essential, cosmetic purpose.” (http://cspinet.org/new/pdf/experts-…)
That letter explains:
4-methylimidazole (4-MI) causes lung tumors in male and female mice and mononuclear cell leukemia in female rats. Other NTP studies found that 2-methylimidazole caused liver tumors in male and female mice, thyroid tumors in male mice, and precancerous thyroid changes in female mice. In rats, 4-MI caused an increased rate of tumors in thyroid follicular cells in females and an increased rate of hyperplasia in thyroid follicular cells in males.
Even the term “caramel coloring” is extremely misleading to consumers, because most people think it’s related to caramel candy, which is made by browning sugar under heat. But the “caramel coloring” used in colas is made by exposing sugars to industrial chemicals (ammonia and sulfites), resulting in a cocktail of cancer-causing chemicals.
Coke and Pepsi products may soon bear cancer warnings in California
California’s Proposition 65 law limits the consumption of 4-MI to no more than 16 micrograms per day from a single product. Yet colas contain roughly 200 micrograms of 4-MI in a 20-ounce bottle.
That’s over 12 times the allowable limit under Proposition 65, and that’s in every bottle! Many people drink several bottles a day, further multiplying their exposure to this potential carcinogen.
If cola companies are going to continue to sell their products in California, then, they must now carry cancer warning labels in order to be in compliance with Prop 65. You can bet that a desperate effort is now under way by the cola industry to lobby California regulators and make sure 4-MI gets removed from any enforcement of Prop 65.
Tags: Chemicals, Coca Cola, Global News, Government, Health, PepsiCo, Politics
Added: 28. January 2011
Tags: Barack Obama, Benzene, BP, Chemicals, Corexit, Global News, Government, Gulf of Mexico, Obama administration, Oil, Politics, U.S.
See also:
- 30 Facts – The Rothschild Bankers Planned The Gulf Disaster
- Jesse Ventura Conspiracy Theory: ‘Gulf Coast Oil Spill’ (Must-see!)
More shocking information at the end of Senator Crow’s letter.
1/16/2011
The Honorable Barack Obama
The President of the United States
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20500
Re: The environmental impact of dispersing Corexit during and after the oil spill
Dear Mr. President;
The BP incident in the Gulf of Mexico has now been acknowledged as the greatest manmade disaster in history but there is yet another manmade disaster that must not be overlooked and has not been adequately addressed in the recently released report of the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon oil disaster.
That second major disaster has been caused by the unnecessary use of the toxin Corexit dispersant. In early May of 2010 just after the crisis began, I requested that our Louisiana Attorney General Buddy Caldwell use whatever legal means were necessary to stop the use of this toxin. Shortly thereafter, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal requested that the use of this toxic dispersant be discontinued because of the long-term environmental damage. And still later, it was reported in the media that you also ordered BP to stop using Corexit. Surprisingly, I also read in the media that they even refused your request.
Mr. President, my concern is that this toxic and damaging chemical is still being used and it will compound the long-term damage to our state, our citizens, our eco-system, our economy, our seafood industry, our wildlife and our culture.
I am well aware that our emphasis, resources and energy is currently engaged working through the administrative and legal proceedings of the oil disaster but we must also recognize and begin the same process to address the damage Corexit has done and will continue to do as we go forward.
As the State Senator for District 1 in the southeastern corner of the State of Louisiana representing the parishes of St. Tammany, St. Bernard, Orleans and Plaquemines, I respectfully request that you have your administrative officials provide the information requested in this letter. I need to make that information available to my constituents who are seeing their lives and lands threatened and their way of life hanging in the balance. Due to the threats to public safety and ecological realities, I am compelled to write this letter requesting answers to my questions regarding the role of the United States Government in administering the response to the crises in the Gulf. It is apparent that the response directed by our government was inadequate because it allowed the use of Corexit dispersants which increased the toxicity level of the spilled oil and delivered no substantial benefit.
Corexit dispersants increased the toxicity of the oil itself when the two were mixed together. Its use caused the cross contamination of the Gulf water column by forcing the transfer of the surface oil downward through the water column, causing the oil to sink to the Gulf floor. The result was an unnecessary elevated negative impact as this same oil moved ashore later to the tidal zones delivering toxic weathered oil to coastal residents, tourists and businesses and workers in the Gulf region.
Government officials stated over and over that the use of the dispersants was designed to break up the oil into smaller digestible parts to be consumed by the sub-sea living micro-organisms. This strategy is unsubstantiated. In fact, the Corexit dispersant created the opposite results since Corexit contains toxic ingredients which act as biocides to prevent microbial digestion of the oil. Physical evidence supports that the entire response administered by government agencies have been inadequate.
Tags: Barack Obama, BP, Chemicals, Corexit, Environment, EPA, Global News, Government, Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana, NOAA, Oil, Politics, toxic, toxicity, U.S.
“1 in 6 children in this country is diagnosed with a neurobehavioral disorder. “
- R. Thomas Zoeller (Endocrinologist and Prof. of biology)
PDF: EPA lists Aspartame as dangerous chemical
More information:
- Study: Aspartame Induces Lung And Liver Cancer
- Dr. Russell Blaylock: Hidden Sources Of MSG In Foods (Flashback)
- Aspartame rebranded as ‘AminoSweet’
- Aspartame: Sweet Misery – A Poisoned World (Documentary)
- Venezuela bans Coke Zero, cites “dangers to health”
- Aspartame kills fire ants … and it also kills you
- Aspartame Study: 67% of Female Rats Developed Visible Tumors
- MSG: Causes obesity, is toxic and destroys your brain
- Your Food is Toxic and Makes You Sick, Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD
- Supermarket Bans Aspartame From Own-Label Products
- Interview with Dr. Russell Blaylock on devastating health effects of MSG, aspartame and excitotoxins
- Chemical Additives – Are They Slowly Killing Our Children?
- George Carlin, Diet Coke With Aspartame & Cardiac Death
Tags: Aspartame, Chemicals, Children, EPA, Excitotoxins, Health, neurotoxic, neurotoxicity, toxic, toxicity, U.S.
See also:
- Sunscreen Causes Cancer! (Natural News)
- CDC Finds 97 Percent of Americans Contaminated by Sunscreens (Natural News)
Sunscreens do cause cancer, especially skin cancer (!), as they contain several dangerous chemicals.
(NaturalNews) Before you apply creams, lotions, cosmetics and sunscreens to your skin, it might be a good idea to find out what’s really in them. What’s more, you need to know those ingredients aren’t necessarily just coating the outside layers of your skin. For example, as NaturalNews previously reported, UCLA scientists have recently discovered nanoparticles in cosmetics and sunscreens can enter and wander throughout the body, potentially disrupting body functions on a sub-cellular level (http://www.naturalnews.com/027603_n…). And now, for the first time, a study just published in the international science journal Chemospherehas shown that a group of chemicals known as UV (for ultraviolet radiation) filters are turning up in humans internally — and the phenomenon is widespread.
In fact, the investigation, conducted by a Swiss National Research Program called Endocrine Disrupters: Relevance to Humans, Animals and Ecosystems, found UV filters, which are common in cosmetics and sunscreens, were present in 85 percent of human milk samples tested. What does this mean for adults, much less babies taking in this contaminated milk? The alarming truth is, no one knows.
For the study, during the fall and summer of 2004, 2005 and 2006, human milk was sampled from mothers who had given birth at the University Women’s Hospital in Basel, Switzerland. The research participants also answered detailed questionnaires in order to document their use of different types of cosmetic products and sunscreens.
When the women’s breast milk was analyzed, tests revealed the milk samples contained a huge list of chemicals including persistent organic pollutants (POPs), synthetic musk fragrances, pesticides, phthalates, parabens, flame retardants (polybrominated diphenylethers), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) — and cosmetic UV filters. What’s more, the UV filter chemicals were surprisingly widespread; they were comparable in concentrations to PCBs, which have long been known to contaminate the environment.
“Research on the effects of endocrine disrupters (chemicals interfering with hormone actions) has shown that it is of utmost importance to obtain information on simultaneous exposure of humans to different types of chemicals because endocrine active chemicals can act in concert. Information on exposure is particularly important for the developing organism at its most sensitive early life stages. Human milk was chosen because it provides direct information on exposure of the suckling infant and indirect information on exposure of the mother during pregnancy,” research team leaders Margret Schlumpf and Walter Lichtensteiger said in a media statement.
Tags: Cancer, Chemicals, Endocrine system, Global News, Health, Nanoparticles, PCBs, Science, sunscreen, UCLA
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/silver/t24_ag_en_usoz_2.gif)
