Society

During the whole planscamdemic, I and many others, including our colleague and friend Catherine Austin Fitts, began to suspect and argue that the whole point of the planscamdemic was to do human testing of highly experimental drugs and injections on an uninformed and misinformed population that had been bamboozled into taking the injections. As the adverse reactions mounted and various bizarre things began to be reported – largely in the alternative media because the lamestream media, as is well known were already in the pockets of Big Pharma – the list of strangeness in reactions grew longer. Some people began to report neuro-physiological symptoms: twitching and uncontrollable muscle spasms similar to epileptic seizures, or in some cases, similar to Kreuzfeld-Jakob’s (mad cow) disease. Others reported massive inflammation and swelling in limbs. On occasion we heard about renal failure. Pregnant women began to miscarry their babies, or for non-pregnant women and even pre-pubescent girls, changes in menstrual patterns emerged or, in some cases in girls, bleeding from the uterus. We also heard about some people actually displaying strange magnetic properties at the site of their “jab”.  And of course, the most well-known reaction was the strange and elongated rubbery clots that coroners and morticians began to discover in corpses after the deaths of people who had received some of the injections, a reaction that coined the nickname “the clot shot” for the injections.

It was this very strange list of adverse reactions that suggested to me, to Catherine, and to many others, that what we were witnessing were reactions to different batches containing different ingredients of what was supposed to be one basic kind of injection for one basic thing. We were, I argued, looking at a vast and massive experiment of different things on the human population, and a study and compilation of the reactions to these different batch numbers.

As far as I know, this hypothesis has never been confirmed or denied, though I suspect the evidence in adverse reactions itself is now sufficient to argue prima facie that there were different batches.

But now, one of our regular readers and article contributors, V.T., noticed the following very short clip of a video. Normally, as people know, I do not have time for, nor like to use, videos in blogs.

This one, however, is significant enough that it deserves mention. It is very short, only a few seconds long. You might have to replay it several times to hear what is being admitted, but the question, its implications, and the admission are loud and clear:

Pfizer employees were given a *special batch*… different from what was forced into the general population pic.twitter.com/2jmWRAjpKB

— healthbot (@thehealthb0t) April 16, 2024

This appears to be an official committee investigation somewhere, and my guess is Australia. but what one hears is that  apparently Pfizer employees were given a different batch of the “shot” than was issued to the general public. With that apparent admission, one wonders if that batch was the “control group placebo”, or what.

Read moreA SPECIAL BATCH JUST FOR EMPLOYEES