Previously Unpublished 2012 Fukushima Plume Map From Government Scientists Shows Alaska Coast Already Being Impacted

Previously unpublished 2012 Fukushima plume map from gov’t scientists: “Radioactivity will almost entirely shift to eastern N. Pacific” – Rhodes Scholar: No one can imagine what effects radiation flowing into ocean will have on sea life and ‘other things’ (VIDEO) (ENENews, Dec 23, 2013):

Radionuclide Transport from Fukushima to Eastern North Pacific, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 2013 PICES Annual Meeting on Oct. 15, 2013:

  • Main inventory of Fukushima 137Cs had been transported towards central North Pacific By 2012. […] The inventory of Fukushima radioactivity will almost entirely shift from the western to the eastern North Pacific during the next 5 years.
  • Surface water distribution of Fukushima 137Cs in 2012 (Aoyama et al., 2013; G. Hong, pers. comm. [personal communication]):

Previously Unpublished 2012 Fukushima Plume Map From Government Scientists Shows Alaska Coast Already Being Impacted

Interview with Alex Kerr, “[Rhodes] scholar, linguist, specialist and prize winner” –Japan Times, Dec. 23, 2013:

At 1:30 in

[…] the radioactivity that’s flowing into the ocean — no one can imagine what the long-term effects are going to be on sea life — and many other things. […]

Watch the broadcast here

‘You can expect an enormous amount of cancers’ around Pacific — ‘We’re all at risk, this radiated water is going to hit right here’ in U.S.

Reports: “You can expect an enormous amount of cancers” around Pacific — “We’re all at risk, this radiated water is going to hit right here” in U.S. — We’re at top of food chain, so we get highest radiation dose — 35+ people now suffering cancer after U.S. rescue mission off Fukushima (VIDEO) (ENENews, Dec 23, 2013):

New York Post, Dec. 22, 2013:  […] three years after their deployment on a humanitarian mission to Japan’s ravaged coast [scores of] crew members on the [USS Ronald Reagan] aircraft carrier and a half-dozen other support ships are battling cancers, thyroid disease, uterine bleeding and other ailments. […] The fallout of those four days spent off the Fukushima coast has been tragic to many of the 5,000 sailors who were there. […] At least 70 have been stricken with some form of radiation sickness, and of those, “at least half .?.?. are suffering from some form of cancer,” their lawyer, Paul Garner, told The Post Saturday. “We’re seeing leukemia, testicular cancer and unremitting gynecological bleeding requiring transfusions and other intervention,” said Garner […] “Then you have thyroid polyps, other thyroid diseases” […]

Read more‘You can expect an enormous amount of cancers’ around Pacific — ‘We’re all at risk, this radiated water is going to hit right here’ in U.S.

Cell Phone Use Linked To Lower Grades, Anxiety, And Much Worse …

Cell Phone Use Linked to Lower Grades, Anxiety, and Much Worse… (Mercola, Dec 19, 2013):

Mounting research raises tremendously important questions about the long-term safety of saturating ourselves in electromagnetic frequencies. As a result, at least a dozen countries around the world have begun to adopt a precautionary approach toward cell phone use and other wireless technologies.

For example, two years ago, a Council of Europe committee concluded that “immediate action was required to protect children” after examining the evidence.1 Russian officials have issued the recommendation that all children under the age of 18 should avoid using cell phones entirely. And the UK, Israel, Germany, India and Finland also urge citizens to err on the side of caution with respect to their children’s use of cell phones.

Read moreCell Phone Use Linked To Lower Grades, Anxiety, And Much Worse …

DNA Evidence Debunks The ‘Out-of-Africa’ Theory of Human Evolution

DNA Evidence Debunks the “Out-of-Africa” Theory of Human Evolution (Wake Up World, Dec 16, 2013):

Scientific evidence refuting the theory of modern humanity’s African genesis is common knowledge among those familiar with the most recent scientific papers on the human Genome, Mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosomes. Regrettably, within mainstream press and academia circles, there seems to be a conspicuous – and dare we say it – deliberate vacuum when it comes to reporting news of these recent studies and their obvious implications.

This article was inspired by a comment made recently by Australian historian Greg Jefferys. So before continuing a scientific assessment of DNA evidence, I will first open this discussion by outlining Greg Jefferys’ comments.

The whole ‘Out of Africa’ myth has its roots in the mainstream academic campaign in the 1990?s to remove the concept of Race. When I did my degree they all spent a lot of time on the ‘Out of Africa’ thing but it’s been completely disproved by genetics. Mainstream still hold on to it.

It did begin the early 90’s. And the academics most responsible for cementing both the Out-of Africa theory and the complementary common ancestral African mother – given the name of “Eve” – in the public arena and nearly every curriculum, were Professors Alan C. Wilson and Rebecca L. Cann. In their defense, the authors of this paper were fully aware that genealogy is not in any way linked to geography, and that their placement of Eve in Africa was an assumption, never an assertion. In their seminal paper The Recent African Genesis of Humans, they even stipulated “that all humans today can be traced along maternal lines of descent to a woman who lived about 200,000 years ago, probably in Africa.”

Read moreDNA Evidence Debunks The ‘Out-of-Africa’ Theory of Human Evolution

Scientists Concerned ATLANTIC Ocean To Be Contaminated By Fukushima Plume – Currents Carrying It To U.S. East Coast

captain-obvious-1

Gov’t scientists concerned Atlantic Ocean to be contaminated by Fukushima plume now in Pacific — Currents carrying it to U.S. East Coast (PHOTOS) (ENENews, Dec 21, 2013):

Radionuclide Transport from Fukushima to Eastern North Pacific, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 2013 PICES Annual Meeting on Oct. 15, 2013:

Atlantic Ocean to be contaminated by Fukushima plume

Samples [were] collected in 2012 at several arctic stations to evaluate Pacific Water inflow of radioactivity to the Beaufort Sea. […]Why Measure 137Cs in Arctic?Pacific water contaminated with Fukushima 137Cs flows through Bering Strait and mixes with underlying Atlantic water labeled with 137Cs from Sellafield nuclear fuel reprocessing plant and Chernobyl accident.

Read moreScientists Concerned ATLANTIC Ocean To Be Contaminated By Fukushima Plume – Currents Carrying It To U.S. East Coast

Russian Food Security Experts Fight GMO Registrations in Supreme Court

Russian Food Security Experts Fight GMO Registrations in Supreme Court (Sustainable Pulse, Dec 19, 2013):

A group of scientists and food security experts have taken the Russian Government resolution, which will allow the registration of GM crops and products containing GMOs from June 1, 2014, to the Supreme Court.

On December 16 the group, which includes representatives of non-profit organizations and experts in the field of biological and food security, filed a suit in Russia’s Supreme Court to challenge the adoption of Russian Government Decree 839 of 23 September 2013, regarding the state registration of GMOs.

According to the experts, this Government resolution violates the constitutional rights of Russian citizens, including the right to a healthy environment, and food safety information.

Read moreRussian Food Security Experts Fight GMO Registrations in Supreme Court

Canadian Government Scientists: Model Shows Levels From Fukushima Will Exceed ‘Maximum Fallout’ In Pacific

Canadian Gov’t Scientists: Model shows levels from Fukushima will exceed ‘maximum fallout’ in Pacific — “Not a human health radiological threat!” (ENENews, Dec 20, 2013):

Radionuclide Transport from Fukushima to Eastern North Pacific, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 2013 PICES Annual Meeting on October 15, 2013:

To what historical fallout level does Fukushima return us? Rossi model; takes us to levels higher than maximum fallout.

Caveat: These levels are still well below maximum permissible concentrations in drinking water for 137Cs of 10,000 Bq/m3: Not an environmental or human health radiological threat!

Read moreCanadian Government Scientists: Model Shows Levels From Fukushima Will Exceed ‘Maximum Fallout’ In Pacific

‘One Fukushima May Destroy The Whole Country’

Investigation Chairman: “One Fukushima may destroy the whole country” — “Collapse of a whole country possible” (ENENews, Dec 20, 2013):

Presentation by Professor Koichi Kitazawa, chairman of the Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident and former chairman of the Japan Science and Technology Agency, ISES 2013:

Slide 23

People’s desire of de-nuclearization if possible

  • Finite risk does remain. nuclear plant not “fail safe”
  • A gigantic risk ?collapse of a whole country possible + Nuclear waste negative heritage >10000yrs

One Fukushima may destroy the whole country

Slide 27

Read more‘One Fukushima May Destroy The Whole Country’

End Double Standards In Evaluating GMO Safety Studies – Say Scientists

Related info:

ENSSER: 297 Scientists And Experts Agree GMOs Not Proven Safe

ENSSER Comments On The Retraction Of The Séralini Et Al. 2012 Study


ensser

End double standards in evaluating GMO safety studies – say scientists

Europe’s food safety agency only criticises studies that find risk, new analysis shows

ENSSER Press release

17.12.2013

The controversy about the Séralini et al. study, which reported negative health effects of Monsanto’s NK603 GM maize and Roundup herbicide fed to rats over the long term,[1] is still going on. According to a new review published in Environmental Sciences Europe, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) used unscientific double standards to dismiss the Séralini study on genetically modified (GM) maize.[2]

The publication of this latest review comes just days after the retraction of the Séralini paper by Elsevier, the publisher of Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT), on the unprecedented grounds of the “inconclusive” nature of some of the findings. ENSSER condemned the retraction[3] .

The Séralini study triggered an immediate storm of criticism by scientists and organisations, most of whom are known for their support of GMOs and their pleas for sweeping deregulation of GM plants in the EU and relaxation or even abandonment of risk assessment standards.[4]

Retrospective and selective application of new standards by EFSA

Read moreEnd Double Standards In Evaluating GMO Safety Studies – Say Scientists

‘Stop GMOs’: Russian Scientists Urge 10-Year Ban On Genetically Modified Products

‘Stop GMOs’: Russian scientists urge 10-year ban on genetically modified products (RT, Dec 16, 2013):

Russian scientists are calling for a 10-year moratorium on GMOs to thoroughly study their influence on human health, stressing that such examinations are vital.

“It is necessary to ban GMO, to impose moratorium [on it] for 10 years. While GMO will be prohibited, we can plan experiments, tests, or maybe even new methods of research could be developed,” vice president of Russia’s National Association for Genetic Safety, Irina Ermakova, told Interfax news agency.

Read more‘Stop GMOs’: Russian Scientists Urge 10-Year Ban On Genetically Modified Products

Study: Dead Sea Creatures Covered 98% Of Seafloor Last Year 150 Miles Off California Coast – Unprecedented!!!

Study: Dead sea creatures covered 98% of seafloor last year about 150 miles off California coast; Unprecedented, had been below 1% prior to event — ‘Major’ changes began in spring 2011 (ENENews, DEc 11, 2013):

National Geographic, Nov. 22, 2013: […] “In the 24 years of this study, the past 2 years have been the biggest amounts of this detritus by far,”  said study leader Christine Huffard, a marine biologist at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute in California. […] In March 2012, less than one percent of the seafloor beneath Station M [located 145 miles west of the coast of California between Santa Barbara and Monterey] was covered in dead sea salps. By July 1, more than 98 percent of it was covered in the decomposing organisms, according to the study, published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. […]  Although climate change is a leading contender for explaining the major increases in 2011 and 2012, Huffard says that these spikes could be part of a longer-term trend that scientists haven’t yet observed. She hopes to continue gathering data from Station M to try and figure it out.

Read moreStudy: Dead Sea Creatures Covered 98% Of Seafloor Last Year 150 Miles Off California Coast – Unprecedented!!!

Nobel Winner: How Journals Like Nature, Cell And Science Are Damaging Science

How journals like Nature, Cell and Science are damaging science (Guardian, by Randy Schekman, Dec 9, 2013):

The incentives offered by top journals distort science, just as big bonuses distort banking

I am a scientist. Mine is a professional world that achieves great things for humanity. But it is disfigured by inappropriate incentives. The prevailing structures of personal reputation and career advancement mean the biggest rewards often follow the flashiest work, not the best. Those of us who follow these incentives are being entirely rational – I have followed them myself – but we do not always best serve our profession’s interests, let alone those of humanity and society.

We all know what distorting incentives have done to finance and banking. The incentives my colleagues face are not huge bonuses, but the professional rewards that accompany publication in prestigious journals – chiefly Nature, Cell and Science.

Read moreNobel Winner: How Journals Like Nature, Cell And Science Are Damaging Science

Nobel Winner Declares Boycott Of Top Science Journals Nature, Cell And Science As They Distort Scientific Process

Nobel winner declares boycott of top science journals (The Guardian, Dec 9, 2013):

Randy Schekman says his lab will no longer send papers to Nature, Cell and Science as they distort scientific process

Leading academic journals are distorting the scientific process and represent a “tyranny” that must be broken, according to a Nobel prize winner who has declared a boycott on the publications.

Randy Schekman, a US biologist who won the Nobel prize in physiology or medicine this year and receives his prize in Stockholm on Tuesday, said his lab would no longer send research papers to the top-tier journals, Nature, Cell and Science.

Schekman said pressure to publish in “luxury” journals encouraged researchers to cut corners and pursue trendy fields of science instead of doing more important work. The problem was exacerbated, he said, by editors who were not active scientists but professionals who favoured studies that were likely to make a splash.

The prestige of appearing in the major journals has led the Chinese Academy of Sciences to pay successful authors the equivalent of $30,000 (£18,000). Some researchers made half of their income through such “bribes”, Schekman said in an interview.

Read moreNobel Winner Declares Boycott Of Top Science Journals Nature, Cell And Science As They Distort Scientific Process

ENSSER: 297 Scientists And Experts Agree GMOs Not Proven Safe

297 scientists and experts agree GMOs not proven safe (European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility, Dec 10, 2013):

*EU chief scientist Anne Glover’s backing for GM condemned as “irresponsible”

*Independent researchers work double shift to address “red flags” on GMO safety

Press release, European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility, 10 Dec 2013

The number of scientists and experts who have signed a joint statement[1] saying that GM foods have not been proven safe and that existing research raises concerns has climbed to 297 since the statement was released on 21 October.

Dr Angelika Hilbeck, chair of the European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility (ENSSER), which published the statement, said, “We’re surprised and pleased by the strong support for the statement. It seems to have tapped into a deep concern in the global scientific community that the name of science is being misused to make misleading claims about the safety of GM technology.”

Read moreENSSER: 297 Scientists And Experts Agree GMOs Not Proven Safe

Researchers Show How Your Thoughts Can Change Your DNA

Related info:

Your Thoughts Can Release Abilities Beyond Normal Limits (Scientific American)

Is GMO Rewiring Our DNA?

Dr. Bruce Lipton: The Biology Of Perception (Full Presentation)

Dr. Bruce Lipton: The New Biology – Where Mind and Matter Meet (Video) (MUST-SEE!)


Researchers Finally Show How Mindfulness and Your Thoughts Can Induce Specific Molecular Changes To Your Genes (Waking Times, Dec 5, 2013):

With evidence growing that training the mind or inducing specific modes of consciousness can have beneficial health effects, scientists have sought to understand how these practices physically affect the body. A new study by researchers in Wisconsin, Spain, and France reports the first evidence of specific molecular changes in the body following a period of intensive mindfulness practice.

The study investigated the effects of a day of intensive mindfulness practice in a group of experienced meditators, compared to a group of untrained control subjects who engaged in quiet non-meditative activities. After eight hours of mindfulness practice, the meditators showed a range of genetic and molecular differences, including altered levels of gene-regulating machinery and reduced levels of pro-inflammatory genes, which in turn correlated with faster physical recovery from a stressful situation.

Read moreResearchers Show How Your Thoughts Can Change Your DNA

Medical Researchers Find Toxic Pesticides From GMO Food In Unborn Babies

Toxic Pesticides from GM Food Found in Unborn Babies (Natural News, Dec 5, 2013):

Medical researchers at the University of Sherbrooke Hospital Centre in Quebec found that toxic pesticides used on genetically modified crops and animal feed entered and remained in the bodies of pregnant women and fed into their unborn babies through the umbilical cord.

Among the sample of pregnant women in the study, 93% tested positive for the pesticides, and 80% tested positive for them in their umbilical cords.  The source of these pesticide residues were determined to be diet, specifically the consumption of conventionally-grown grains, fruits and vegetables, along with meat from livestock fed genetically modified, conventionally-grown feed.

Read moreMedical Researchers Find Toxic Pesticides From GMO Food In Unborn Babies

Study: Evidence Of ‘Uncontrollable Nuclear Reaction’ After Fukushima Reactors Shutdown – ‘Emerged Criticality’ Supported By Data

Study: Evidence of “uncontrollable nuclear reaction” after Fukushima reactors shutdown — “Emerged criticality” supported by data (PHOTOS) (ENENews, Dec 5, 2013):

Estimation of Nuclear-Energy Excursion Possibility during Fukushima-1 NPP Accident, CTBTO: Science & Technology, June 2013: [March 15 at Takasaka monitoring station ~250km SW of Fukushima-1] registered levels of radioactive aerosols exceeded the possible ranges of measurements […] The highest values of radioactivity were indicated on March 16. […] iodine-135 (half-life period = 6,6 hour) reached value of 74 Bq/m3, and the ratio of iodine-135/iodine-131 activities reached value of 24 that pointed indicated on “fresh” fission products from the damaged reactors, and also testified to possibility of emerged uncontrollable nuclear reaction. Unfortunately, the data of radioactive noble gases concentrations were not correctly obtained at Takasaka’s station because of too high levels of their content and equipment pollution. […] reinforce or reject the hypothesis of secondary criticality at the Fukushima-1 accident could be possible […]

Sulfur-35 in Southern California, June 2013: […] data in favor of the criticality is given in [5] where the results of the determination of radioactive sulfur-35 in sulfate aerosols and gaseous SO2 in the oceanic air on the Pacific coast in the village of La Jolla, California. This data indicate exposure of sea water to neutrons with fluence 4 x 10^11 neutrons per m2.  Radionuclide sulfur-35 is formed from seawater containing chlorine-35 by neutron irradiation.

Read moreStudy: Evidence Of ‘Uncontrollable Nuclear Reaction’ After Fukushima Reactors Shutdown – ‘Emerged Criticality’ Supported By Data

Expert: People On West Coast Right To Be Concerned About Fukushima Plume – Things ‘Could Get Much Worse’ – Gov’t NOT Testing Water Or Fish

Expert: People on West Coast right to be concerned about Fukushima plume — Things “could get much worse” — Lots of radioactivity flowing into ocean — Gov’t not testing water or fish (AUDIO) (ENENews, Dec 1, 2013):

The following three nearly identical Letters-to-the-Editor are signed by a John Lewallen of Philo, California.  According to the www.johnlewallenforcongress.org website, “my wife […] Barbara and I own and operate the Mendocino Sea Vegetable Company devoted to hand-harvesting […] seaweed”:

  • Times-Standard, Dec. 1, 2013 (emphasis added): Fukushima rads won’t hurt us here […] “The situation is of concern near Japan coast where fisheries remain closed,” [WHOI Senior Scientist] Ken Buesseler wrote in an email to me on Nov. 17. “There is a lot of radioactivity left in the tanks (they have removed much of the cesium, but strontium-90 is still very high), contaminated groundwater that flows to the ocean, and spent fuel pool. Something could get much worse
  • Anderson Valley Advertiser, Nov. 28, 2013: Scientific team finds no harmful radiation from Fukushima on West Coast
  • Sonoma Index-Tribune, Nov. 21, 2013: No Fukushima radiation on West Coast

Here is what Buesseler said on the radio two days ago (at 10:00 in): “I completely agree that no radiation has been seen in the regards that we’re not really testing for it ((laughter)) in any organized way […] We have very few data; it’s not really being organized. The government says we don’t really need to do that because we’re predicting very low levels. On the other hand, you could argue I’d very much like to see study on our side of the ocean just to confirm these values and build some confidence with the public that’s been concerned about this. They’re right to be concerned — as scientists we’re telling them they shouldn’t be, but it’d be nice to have a few more data points to fill that gap […] I’ve been told that there’s very little testing going on.”

Buesseler statements on Friday give new meaning to headlines like ‘No Fukushima radiation on West Coast‘ and ‘Scientific team finds no harmful radiation from Fukushima on West Coast‘.

Listen to Buesseler on the radio here (at 10:00 in)

ENSSER Comments On The Retraction Of The Séralini Et Al. 2012 Study

ENSSER Comments on the Retraction of the Séralini et al. 2012 Study (European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility, Nov 29, 2013):

ENSSER Comments on the Retraction of the Séralini et al. 2012 Study

Journal’s retraction of rat feeding paper is a

travesty of science and looks like a bow to industry

Elsevier’s journal Food and Chemical Toxicology has retracted the paper by Prof. Gilles-Eric Séralini’s group which found severe toxic effects (including liver congestions and necrosis and kidney nephropathies), increased tumor rates and higher mortality in rats fed Monsanto’s genetically modified NK603 maize and/or the associated herbicide Roundup[1]. The arguments of the journal’s editor for the retraction, however, violate not only the criteria for retraction to which the journal itself subscribes, but any standards of good science. Worse, the names of the reviewers who came to the conclusion that the paper should be retracted, have not been published. Since the retraction is a wish of many people with links to the GM industry, the suspicion arises that it is a bow of science to industry. ENSSER points out, therefore, that this retraction is a severe blow to the credibility and independence of science, indeed a travesty of science.

Inconclusive results claimed as reason for withdrawal

Read moreENSSER Comments On The Retraction Of The Séralini Et Al. 2012 Study

Mobile Phone Radiation Breast Cancer Link – New Study Raises Grave Concerns

Cell phone radiation breast cancer link – New study raises grave concerns (Natural News, Nov 27, 2013):

A new study raises concerns of a possible association between cell phone radiation exposure and breast cancer in young women.

The research team, led by Dr. Lisa Bailey, a former president of the American Cancer Society’s California Division and one of California’s top breast surgeons, studied four young women – aged from 21 to 39 years old – with multifocal invasive breast cancer.

The researchers observed that all the patients developed tumors in areas of their breasts next to where they carried their cell phones, often for up to 10 hours per day, for several years. None of the patients had a family history of breast cancer. They all tested negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 – breast cancer genes linked to about one-half of breast cancer cases – and they had no other known breast cancer risks.

Imaging of the young girls’ breasts revealed a clustering of multiple tumor foci in the part of the breast directly under where their cell phones touched their body.

Read moreMobile Phone Radiation Breast Cancer Link – New Study Raises Grave Concerns