You’ll find a lot more additional info on chemotherapy down below.
Learn what highly toxic, cancer causing chemical is actually used to treat cancer.
(Click on image to enlarge.)
A groundbreaking 14-year study was published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology called “The Contribution of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy to 5-year Survival in Adult Malignancies”.
Read the full study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology (Dec. 2004) here (and take a look at those tables at page 3 & 4):
Studied were the 5-year survival rates of chemotherapy on 22 types of cancers in the US and Australia.
154,971 Americans & Australians cancer patients, age 20 and older, were treated with chemotherapy.
The survival of only 3,306 could be ‘credited’ to chemo.
A short info from WebMD:
Study Results: “The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1 % in The USA”
Study Conclusion:“As the 5-year survival rate in Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival.To justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required.”
Chemotherapy contributed on average only 2,1% to the overall survival rate!
Some cancers respond better to chemo than others.
Best results from chemo: Testicular Cancer 41.8% effectiveness & Hodgkins Disease with 35.8% effectiveness.
Here are the survival rates for each type of cancer in the US:
(Click on image to enlarge.)
Notice that the survival rate for some cancers after chemotherapy treatment has a dash (-), meaning ZERO effectiveness of chemotherapy toward 5-year survival, but is still used a treatment for these cancers today, over 11 years after this study has been published.
But wait it gets worse, much worse:
Not one of these 3,306 cancer patients (2.1%) cancer patients that survived the 5 year chemotherapy torture was mentioned to be cancer free.
They were only ‘still alive’ five years into poisoning their bodies with toxic chemicals.
So how many of those 3,306 cancer patients still had cancer?
(Probably most of them, if not all of them.)
And how many would make it to the 10-year mark on chemo?
(Probably close to none, because I do not believe that even a healthy human being would survive a ten year chemo ordeal. And down below you find why I think/believe/know that not even a healthy person will survive this. Everybody should really take a look what chemicals are actually used in chemo drugs.)
One thing for sure, the results would be even more devastating.
* * *
The question to ask is why is
death camp medicine chemotherapy still prescribed as standard treatment today?
More info on chemotherapy (and radiotherapy):
– American Cancer Society admits conventional cancer treatment causes more cancer
* * *
Now let’s take a look at what chemical is commonly used in the chemotherapy, incl. chemotherapy tablets …
In English: Fluorouracil (Wikipedia)
In German: Fluoruracil (Wikipedia)
Here is a commonly used chemo drug taken in the form of tablets:
Xeloda – Generic Name: Capecitabine http://chemocare.com/
chemotherapy/drug-info/Xeloda. aspxTablets come in 2 sizes; 150mg and 500mg.
CapecitabineCapecitabine (INN) /keɪpˈsaɪtəbiːn/ (Xeloda, Roche) is an orally-administered chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of numerous cancers. Capecitabine is a prodrug that is enzymatically converted to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the body.
Some historic background on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU):
Dr. Louis Bullock, president of the Los Angeles branch of the American Cancer Society touted the new cancer drug 5-Fluoracil as “one of the most effective drugs used to treat and control cancer”, stating that they ‘safely’ gave cancer patients 150 to 500 mg of fluoride a day”, and that “it strengthened the bones”. [Yet, the 1965 Modern Drug Encyclopedia and Therapeutic Index Pharmaceuticals, Biologicals and Allergens contains a three-column listing of disasterous effects from 5-Fluoracil, one of them being “fatalities may be encountered occasionally in patients in relatively good condition”. In March 31, 1972, the Los Angeles Herald Examiner headlined a story “Scientist Hots Cancer Drug ‘Overkill’ “, which stated that 5-Fluoracil as a cancer treatment represents a case of classic overkill which does more harm than the cancer itself.” In other words, Bullock was either naive or he lied at the July 21, 1966 meeting ]. See 1969 LA Times.
So this is really nothing but toxic “fluoride” which I am warning people about for I don’t know how many years already…. at least since 1997.
And this is what they are giving to cancer patients, pure poison.
Well, they will tell you that fluoride (used in fluoridated water, toothbrush, Prozac, pesticides) and 5-fluorouracil are not the same.
And yes, they are not the same, BUT they are about as much different as a black mamba & an eastern green mamba, both are deadly, but they certainly look different.
“Fluoride causes more human cancer, and causes it faster, than any other chemical.”
– Dean Burk, Chief Chemist Emeritus, US National Cancer Institute
* * *
* * *