Dec 10

Related info:

Agenda 21- David Icke – Blueprint For Global Control (Video)

Agenda 21: The Depopulation Agenda For A New World Order (Video):

Australian politician Ann Bressington exposes Agenda 21, starting at 1:03:55 into the video:

At 1:05:05: “That’s the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen.”


NOAA weather satellite mysteriously destroyed after agency’s climate data manipulation exposed:

Propagandists working at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the United States (NOAA), were caught manipulating temperature records in 2015 to make it seem that the Earth’s surface and ocean temperatures have been rising for the past 15 years.

Since the agency is controlled by the Executive branch of government, it makes sense that the manipulation of temperature data would ultimately be used to promote the global warming agenda of the Obama administration. All of this plays into a much bigger deception to gain public approval for more world governance – where the elite make decisions for the people of the world, all from the United Nations headquarters.

United Nations’ plan to restrict individual liberty through Agenda 21

We now know that there is a globalist agenda to centralize government power so that the Earth’s resources can be controlled and distributed to the people of the world in a “fair” manner. Phrases like “protecting the environment” or “sustainability of Earth’s resources” are used to bring in new rules that restrict individual liberty and promote multi-national corporate interests.

Proof of this totalitarian goal is seen in the United Nation’s Agenda 21, which is slowly influencing local governments in the US and around the world. Launched by the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) in 1991, Agenda 21 is an action plan to subtly make governments comply with UN global governance – an agenda that ultimately determines things like how everyone’s food will be grown and processed, or how much water individuals can use.

Government agencies like the NOAA can be used to manipulate and broadcast fake weather and temperature data to promote global warming fraud so that everyone is forced to believe that individual freedom is the problem, and that Earth’s resources need to be managed by global governance. This fear tactic allows the governments to implement taxes and new laws that dictate what type of energy people use, how big their homes are, how much land they can own, or how many kids they can have.

If the people can be convinced that the science is settled – that climate change is the greatest threat to the world – then the government can come up with “solutions” that restrict the people’s liberty. It’s all about control.

NOAA being used to promote global warming propaganda?

As The Daily Caller reported earlier in 2015 about NOAA’s manipulation of climate data:

“To increase the rate in warming, NOAA scientists put more weight on certain ocean buoy arrays, adjusted ship-based temperature readings upward, and slightly raised land-based temperatures as well. Scientists said adjusted ship-based temperature data ‘had the largest impact on trends for the 2000-2014 time period, accounting for 0.030°C of the 0.064°C trend difference.'”

They also reported that, “buoy offset correction contributed 0.014°C… to the difference, and the additional weight given to the buoys because of their greater accuracy contributed 0.012°C.”

The US Congress launched an investigation into the matter, questioning the imminent threat of climate change that the President Obama continues to call “settled science.” The Congressional panel issued subpoenas and demanded that the NOAA hand over emails and records from U.S. scientists who participated in the study. The NOAA refused, and the investigation is ongoing.

Weather satellite battery failures – accident or design?

Interestingly, an important weather satellite, the NOAA 16, had reportedly broken up on November 25th. The Joint Space Operations Center identified an unspecified amount of “associated objects” orbiting around the abruptly destroyed NOAA 16 at 3:41 A.M. Eastern time. The reports indicate there was no collision; accordingly, NOAA 16 broke apart by itself due to a faulty battery. Launched in 2000, the weather satellite was expected to last up to five years in space. NOAA continued to use the satellite until June 2014, when they retired the spacecraft because of a “critical anomaly.”

Earlier in the year, another satellite exploded the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program Flight 13 satellite. The implosion was due to a ruptured battery. Similiarly, in 1993, NOAA 13 suddenly shut down “due to a full battery discharge.”

The newly imploded NOAA 16 contained the same type of battery that these self-destructed satellites possessed. Were the batteries, designed by Lockheed Martin Space Systems, designed to fail on command? Did the engineers for Lockheed equip the satellites with a kill switch to destroy certain types of data that could be damning to world agendas?

Sources include:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “NOAA weather satellite mysteriously destroyed after agency’s climate data manipulation exposed”

  1. squodgy Says:

    I am a member of a local Wildlife Trust, and upon receiving the latest newsletter, read its introduction by the ‘Director’ praising the IPCC ‘Climate Conference’ and plugging the needs for everybody to get on board.
    Naturally I responded expressing my disappointment, including self explanatory links, and personal experiences, all of which, in my humble opinion, more than justified doubt in the official line.
    Even a child can see how chemtrails mess up a clear sky.
    His response was so disappointing, I never bothered to reply….

    Many thanks for your e-mail about climate change.

    I’m afraid, we’ll have to agree to disagree on this. I have taken a deep interest in the science of climate change for decades building on from my PhD that looked at natural climate change over the last 5000 years by looking at the record in peat bogs. Of course, in science, there are many different theories, opinions, facts, data and evidence and sifting through the many different bits is a difficult task especially for a subject as broad and well studied as climate change. This is why the International Panel on Climate Change is so important as they have sought to construct a consensus view from the science. The consensus is over-whelming that anthropogenic air pollution by greenhouse gases (mostly CO2) is causing climate change.

    For wildlife across the world, the consequences are dire which is why I think YWT needs to help to address this issue through our work, on, for example, peatlands and marine.

    I hope my reply does not disappoint you too much as I’m sure we agree on a lot more and can I sincerely thank you for your support.

  2. Infinite Says:

    Maybe you want to send him this …

    Looks like CO2 has very little to do with the Greenhouse Effect …

    Contribution To The Greenhouse Effect - Man-Made-Global-Warming

    … and just look at how little humans are affecting CO2.

    Maybe you want to control the water vapor’s contribution to the Greenhouse Effect.

    Good luck with that!

    And look at those “skyrocketing” CO2 levels …



    … that have risen to “unprecedented” levels. <sarc>

    Couldn’t possibly be the sun, that is the cause of global warming and global cooling …


    Oh, so maybe it is the sun that is responsible for global warming and global cooling after all.

    Ask every child whose presence is warming the earth and whose absence is cooling the earth.

    But maybe that is too bloody obvious (for computer model hockey stick scientists).

    But wait, there is more …

    Surely humans were the ones responsible for “anthropogenic air pollution by greenhouse gases (mostly CO2)” during the the Medieval Warm Period, or what else could have possibly caused the Medieval Warm Period?

    “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.”

    We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.

    Dominance of the graph by the MWP was the challenge. As IPCC participant Jay Overpeck said in his email to Professor Deming, “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.”

    Can’t sell this as anthropogenic air pollution by greenhouse gases, or can they?

    But maybe they can, because the sheeple seem to believe bloody everything these days, just like him.

    And NO, we are not disappointed that he just wants to keep her job and therefor has to support the non-existent consensus “that anthropogenic air pollution by greenhouse gases (mostly CO2) is causing climate change”.

    NASA: Antarctic Has Been COOLING For The Last Six Years

    GLOBAL COOLING: Decade long ice age predicted as sun ‘hibernates’

    Decades Of Global Cooling Ahead

    30 Top Scientists Predict Global Cooling 2015-2050 (Video)

    16 Signs That ‘Global Warming’ Was A Lie And That We Have Now Entered A Period Of Global Cooling

    Top Russian Scientist Predicts 100 Years Of Global Cooling

    Russian Scientists: ‘We Could Face Cooling Period For 200-250 Years’

    Study: Sun May Soon Have Four Poles … Sunspot Activity Appears To Resemble Maunder Minimum

    Meteorologist Piers Corbyn Brands Met Office ‘Lying Scum’

    The Earth Is Cooling, Cloud Level Has Fallen By 1% A Year Over Last Decade

    The CO2 Lie: ‘Global Warming Has Stopped 12 Years Ago!’, Say Prof. Fritz Vahrenholt And Dr. Sebastian Lüning

    Global Warming: THE CO2 Lie: Renowned Team Of Scientists Claim The Climate Catastrophe Is Fear-Mongering By Politics

    Chinese 2,485-Year Tibetan Tree-Ring Study Shows NATURAL CYCLES CONTROL CLIMATE, Predicts Temperatures To COOL Until 2068

    Prof. Ian Plimer: ‘How To Get Expelled From School’ (Video)

    What happened to global warming? The warmest year recorded globally was 1998 (BBC News, Oct.9, 2009):

    This headline may come as a bit of a surprise, so too might that fact that the warmest year recorded globally was not in 2008 or 2007, but in 1998.

    (And these are just a few links. Maybe he should try and use the bloody internet and do some research.)

  3. squodgy Says:

    I will, but won’t expect anything.
    These “Trusts” are run by gongchasing “common Purpose” Politically correct quasi Government ladder climbers.
    Seen it all before.
    His reply was totally lacking in justification,reasoning, detail, and facts.
    All it goes to say is that he is simply towing the line (presumably because he sees a better paid slot he may apply for) and doesn’t want to be seen questioning, challenging or simply not following official Government directives.
    He can’t deny the existence of chemtrails, or the fact the temperature hasn’t moved for 19 years, and may actually agree with our conclusion privately, but officially he is probably just another classic hypocrite.

  4. Infinite Says:

    Accidentally posted it too early. It is updated now.

    At least he is the reason for this post:


  5. squodgy Says:

    So, all those details showing a hiatus in global warming were erroneous because both the equipment and the interpretation was faulty….yerright!

    Jeez they are getting so desperate.

    The lies, twists, squirming, propaganda & open obfuscation of the truth to force through unsafe and politically motivated agendas is mind blowingly unbelievable.

Leave a Reply