– Too-Big-to-Fail Banks Face Up to $870 Billion Capital Gap (Bloomberg, Oct 14, 2014):
Too big to fail is likely to prove a costly epithet for the world’s biggest banks as regulators demand they increase holdings of debt securities to cover losses should they collapse.
The shortfall facing lenders from JPMorgan Chase & Co. to HSBC Holdings Plc could be as much as $870 billion, according to estimates from AllianceBernstein Ltd., or as little as $237 billion forecast by Barclays Plc.
The range is so wide because proposals from the Basel-based Financial Stability Board outline various possibilities for the amount lenders need to have available as a portion of risk-weighted assets. With those holdings in excess of $21 trillion at the lenders most directly affected, small changes to assumptions translate into big numbers.
Too Big to Fail
“The direction is clear and it is clear that we are talking about huge amounts,” said Emil Petrov, who heads the capital solutions group at Nomura International Plc in London. “What is less clear is how we get there. Regulatory timelines will stretch far into the future but how quickly will the market demand full compliance?”
The FSB wants to limit the damage the collapse of a major bank would inflict on the world economy by forcing them to hold debt that can be written down to help recapitalize an insolvent lender. For senior bonds to suffer losses under present rules the institution has to enter bankruptcy, a move that would inflict huge damage on the financial system worldwide if it happened to a global bank.
That’s what happened when Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. collapsed in 2008, prompting governments around the world to step in with taxpayers money to rescue lenders placed at risk in the turmoil that followed.
The FSB, which consists of regulators and central bankers from around the world, will present its draft rules to a G-20 summit in Brisbane, Australia, next month. Its proposals call for 27 of the world’s largest banks to hold loss-absorbing debt and equity equivalent to 16 percent to 20 percent of their risk-weighted assets to take losses in a failure, ensuring investors rather than taxpayers pick up the bill should a lender collapse.
Under the plans, these lenders will also have to meet buffer rules set by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, another group of global regulators. These can amount to a further 5 percent of risk-weighted assets, taking banks’ requirements to as much as 25 percent of holdings.
“There’s a huge potential stream of issuance to be done,” said Steve Hussey, who heads financial institutions research at AllianceBernstein in London. The company manages the equivalent of $473 billion. “If the requirements were implemented today then there would be significant shortfalls and pressure for issuance of all kinds of eligible capital.”
Using the 16 percent figure, the shortfall globally is about $375 billion, according to Hussey. At 20 percent, the requirement would be $870 billion, which he called “extreme.” He expects European lenders to have larger needs than the U.S.
JPMorgan and Wells Fargo & Co., may need to raise $127 billion to reach 18 percent of risk weighted assets, according to a note to clients from Barclays analysts, including Brian Monteleone in New York. HSBC, Europe’s biggest lender, and Spain’s Banco Santander SA and Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA may be the only banks in the region affected, needing about $110 billion between them, according to the report.
BNP Paribas SA and HSBC may have shortfalls of $50 billion to $100 billion each, while Banco Santander will need as much as $90 billion, according to Hussey. Barclays will have to cover a gap of $25 billion to $50 billion, he said.
Thue Sondergaard, an analyst at Scope Ratings in London, estimates the shortfall in Europe alone at about 482 billion euros ($610 billion) if a 25 percent requirement is imposed, he said. His sample includes 41 banks and not just the biggest global lenders that some other estimates are based on.
European banks, including some second-tier lenders, will probably have to issue about 500 billion euros of senior debt through holding companies, if they have them, said Simon McGeary, who heads the new products group at Citigroup Inc. in London. Senior bonds issued through a holding company would be subordinated to the liabilities of an operating unit, he said.
“Banks should be able to replace existing debt with bail-in-able debt,” said Ed Firth, an analyst at Macquarie Group Ltd. in London. “Spreads have come in so much that the pricing differential is likely to be very small. Debt markets are in an extraordinarily generous mood.”