YouTube Added: 02.09.2011
Suppressed video released 10 years after 9/11 attacks in the United States clearly shows the Pentagon attack was a Cruise type missile, either a Tomahawk or Russian/Soviet Granit as described by former officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence Dimitri Khalezov.
The little explosions which have been circled in the video clearly point out that “there is no huge jet” hammering into the Pentagon, Khalezov explains.
According to the official U.S. government narration, an American Airline Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
The Boeing 757 is a mid-size, narrow-body twin-engine jet airliner manufactured by Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Its dimension specification include: Wing span 38.05m (124ft 10in), length 47.32m (155ft 3in), height 13.56m (44ft 6in). Wing area 185.3m2 (1994sq ft).
The author of “The third truth about September 11″ says every time he uploads such videos on the internet “my YouTube gets deleted or the hits go down.”
He describes a hole that appeared in a Pentagon wall right after the attack. “Look at that little hole. No way a jet [can] fit in there. Where’s the wings? Where’s the engines?”
The researcher says when the footage is observed frame by frame it shows that “the explosion happens before the ‘jet’ even appears.”
After 11 September 2001, Khalezov undertook extensive research on the collapse of the three World Trade Center Towers. The research is claimed to demonstrate that the three towers were demolished by three underground thermo-nuclear explosions.
Moreover, Khalezov claims that he knew about the in-built so-called “emergency nuclear demolitions scheme” for the Twin Towers as long ago as the 1980′s, while a serviceman in the Soviet Special Control Service.
YouTube Added: 02.09.2011
On the verge of the 9/11 tenth anniversary, leaked videos confirm eye-witnesses’ accounts that the attack was made by a cruise missile rather than a passenger plane, an editor told Press TV’s US Desk.
“There were 85 videos; another video was released yesterday (August 29). Now it hasn’t been carefully vetted but it appears to be quite genuine that clearly shows a cruise missile from another angle hitting the Pentagon,” Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today, told Press TV’s US Desk on Tuesday.
Duff said that CNN reporters at the scene of the 9/11 event in 2001 said they had not seen any plane wreckage after the attack.
According to “reliable reports” from airline pilots, it would be “impossible” for the plane and any pilot at all, including the top air force and navy pilots in the US, to have flown a plane in such a way the Pentagon, he added.
“We have engineers at Boeing — the company that manufactured the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon — that say it couldn’t fly that fast, it can’t fly that low, it can’t make those turns and it couldn’t have been there,” the investigative journalist said.
The close photographs of the Pentagon also show no wreckage of the plane, although normally remains of a plane wreck sometimes cover a square of a mile.
The plane crash does not create a hole 7 to 8 feet across, but it rather creates a hole where the wing hits over 120 feet across, experts say.
“But none of that had happened,” he mentioned.
The video that is available now shows that the missile was rectangular, white, seemingly 17 to 20 feet, supersonic, without wings but with a small tail.
It is still pure conjecture who planned the attack and why he did it, but it is quite clear it was not a plane, according to Duff.
“We’re willing to prove it wasn’t a plane. We’ll prove it in any court of law. Now we have solid evidence that we’ve put together for ten years,” Duff said. “It is our belief that members of the US government and one other foreign government were complicit in the planning and execution of the attacks on 9/11.”
It is very distressing for veterans to know that their own government was responsible for the disaster, and on September 11, 2011 “they are going to come out, parade around, and lie to us again,” he concluded.