Police Want The Power To Walk Through YOUR Neighborhood With Drug Sniffing Dogs (Video)


YouTube Added: 18.10.2012

3 thoughts on “Police Want The Power To Walk Through YOUR Neighborhood With Drug Sniffing Dogs (Video)

  1. Surviving the Coming U.S. Police Surveillance State?

    Once U.S. Government completes building its multi-billion dollar Surveillance State that will spy on Americans’ every move, it is problematic some in government and the private security complex that (profit) selling the government domestic spying systems, will want to insure the Surveillance Police State is made permanent. That can only be achieved by revoking U.S. Citizens’ right to Vote; Americans could not successfully resist politically or otherwise. Congress has approved thousands of police drones to spy on Americans’. The coming Surveillance Police State will have the ability to read your private email, record your phone calls, track your Internet Activity, spy inside your house, literally follow your every move. TSA can search Americans using any mode of transportation.

    The Military and U.S. Government can now use The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 to arrest and indefinitely detain anyone on U.S. Soil (without evidence) on mere suspicion he or she supported hostilities or terrorism or is a Belligerent; Americans can be—indefinitely detained without right to an attorney or trial because of their alleged associations: Expect in the future, Americans will be afraid to involve themselves with grass-roots causes. Under NDAA, U.S. Government or the President can charge any activity, statement, communication supported or (was directly aligned) with an individual or group that government deemed a threat to National Security to order someone’s arrest; including journalists.

    Provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 opened the door for corrupt U.S. Government agents, police and provocateurs to falsify uncorroborated reports and statements to target any American, group or organization for arrest and indefinite detention. Expect that a U.S. Police Surveillance Government may take out of context, any innocent—hastily written email, fax or phone call to allege a crime or violation was committed to arrest a Citizen, order seizure of their property. There are more than 350 laws and violations that can subject property to government asset forfeiture. Government civil asset forfeiture requires no one be convicted, only a civil preponderance of evidence for police to forfeit property, little more than hearsay. The “Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000” (effectively eliminated) the “five year statue of limitations” for Government Civil Asset Forfeiture: the statute now runs five years (from the date) police allege they “learned” an asset became subject to forfeiture. Under the Patriot Act the Government does not have to disclose the evidence used to forfeit your property. Hidden witnesses can be paid part of the assets their secret testimony causes to be forfeited.

    It is problematic a U.S. Police Surveillance Government State will use no-warrant-spying on Americans’ (electronic, phone and other activities) to arrest and blackmail Americans, including corporations in the manner Hitler used the Gestapo to spy and extort support for the Nazi fascist government: Hitler strong-armed parliament to pass his 1933 Discriminatory Decrees that suspended the Constitutional Freedoms of German Citizens. A Nazi Government threat of “Asset Forfeiture” of an individual or corporation’s property was usually sufficient to ensure Nazi support.

    Some U.S. corporations and their operatives work so closely with U.S. Government and law enforcement to spy on, arrest Americans and forfeit their property, they appear merged with U.S. Government—similar to Hitler’s SS and (private secret police) the Gestapo that merged its police and spy activities with the Reich Government to target German Citizens for arrest and property forfeiture.

    Increasingly the U.S. Government and police are using The War on Terrorism to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, to spy on Americans, record without probable cause or warrants Americans’ electronic communications, financial transactions, phone calls, private emails—track Citizens in real time. Congress and Federal Courts have so weakened the Fourth Amendment e.g. The USA Patriot Act, that Government and law enforcement (without probable cause or warrants) search Citizens’ homes and confidential information in hopes of finding evidence to prosecute Americans in criminal, Civil and Asset Forfeiture Proceedings.

    With the coming U.S. Police Surveillance State expect higher unemployment, the economy to stagnate and huge increases in federal taxes to support the Surveillance State. Government employees will fare better, paid higher salaries and more benefits compared to most working Americans spied on by Government. Often only businesses and individuals connected to the police state government can get government contracts; most everyone else is frozen out.

    Historically unhappy Citizens that fear a Government Police Surveillance State won’t risk investing—in homes, income producing property or buy a business that a police state government can confiscate (without due process). For example U.S. Government can use the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 to charge without evidence that all of a Citizen’s assets are subject to civil government forfeiture under the USA Patriot Act charging a Citizen supported an undefined terrorist act or hostilities, or charge without providing evidence a Citizen’s tenant, visitor or employee committed a crime or violation that made their real property or business subject to government forfeiture. Should a Total Surveillance State take over America, generally a Total Police State follows: expect most tangible assets owned by Americans will depreciate, become difficult to sell. Once large numbers of Citizens fear a police State government, they generally buy only products that are absolutely necessary. Historically: Expect corporations and individuals that are protected by a Police Surveillance State that don’t have to fear government or police confiscating their property, will hugely profit purchasing distressed Americans’ real and personal property and government confiscated property. That happened in Nazi Germany after Hitler started enforcing laws he got passed similar to The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 that Pres. Obama signed among others.

    It appears problematic at some point, Americans won’t be allowed employment or the right to operate a business unless approved by Homeland Security; and Homeland will prohibit without explanation Americans using pubic and private transportation without Government approval.

    According to news reports, it appears U.S. Government may have its Total Surveillance Police State mostly completed by the end of 2014.

    Read Oct. 8, 2012: FBI begins installation of $1 billion face recognition system across America

    http://rt.com/usa/news/fbi-recognition-system-ngi-640/
    Read July 26, 2012: Pentagon Will Pay Univ. to Develop Powerful Facial Recog. Software

    http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/item/12216-pentagon-will-pay-univ-to-develop-powerful-facial-recog-software

  2. Without a Warrant: Police Drones—Recording Telephone & Private Conversations In Your Home & Business To Forfeit Property?

    It is problematic local police will want to use drones to record without warrants telephone and private conversations inside Americans’ homes and businesses: Despite some U.S. cities and counties banning or restricting local police using drones without warrants to invade citizens’ privacy, local police have a strong financial incentive (Civil Asset Forfeiture) to use their drones or Federal Drones. Should (no-warrant) drone surveillance evidence be allowed in courts—circumventing the Fourth Amendment, for example drones covertly recording private conversations and electronic communications in Citizens’ homes and businesses, expect federal and local police Civil Asset {Property Forfeitures to escalate. Civil asset forfeiture requires only a mere preponderance of civil evidence for federal government to forfeit property, little more than hearsay: Any conversation, phone call or other electronic communication captured by a drone inside a home or business, police could take out of context to initiate arrests and civil asset forfeitures to confiscate a home, business and related assets. Local police now circumvent state laws that require someone first be convicted of a crime before police can civilly forfeit their property—by referring their investigation to a Federal Government Agency that may legally rebate to local police up to 80% of assets the Feds forfeit. Federal Government is not required to charge anyone with a crime to civilly forfeit property. There are more than 350 laws and violations that can subject property to state and federal government asset forfeiture in addition to illegal drug forfeiture laws. Increasingly local police are paid part or all their salary from proceeds realized from civil and criminal asset forfeiture. Police have to confiscate Citizens’ property to keep their job. This is a clear conflict of interest. At the least, Congress should require the Federal Government prove by Clear and Convincing Evidence that a property is subject to Civil Asset Forfeiture, not a mere preponderance of civil evidence, little more than hearsay.

    The passed Federal “Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000” effectively eliminated the “five year statue of limitations” for Government Civil Asset Forfeiture: the statute now runs five years (from the date) police allege they “learned” an asset became subject to forfeiture. It is foreseeable should (no warrant) government-drone electronic surveillance be admissible in courts, police will relentlessly sift through Citizen and businesses’ (drone captured emails, Internet data, private conversations and phone communications seized on private property in hopes of discovering crime or civil violation to cause arrests and property forfeitures. It is problematic without public oversight, a corrupt U.S. Government agency or local police, may use drone no-warrant searches of Citizens’ emails, Internet data and phone call communications to extort and blackmail Americans; sell (no-warrant drone acquired physical and electronic surveillance information) seized from Americans and private businesses.

    Almost every week the media reports police arrested and convicted for selling drugs, extorting drug dealers, falsifying reports to cause arrests; perjury in court. It is foreseeable this kind of corruption will find its way into government / police drone search and seizure of lawful Citizens’ private property to cause arrests and property forfeiture.

    Under U.S. federal civil forfeiture laws, a person or business need not be charged with a crime for government to forfeit their property. Most U.S. Citizens, property and business owners that defend their assets against Government Civil Asset Forfeiture claim an “innocent owner defense.” This defense can become a “Catch 22” criminal prosecution trap for both guilty and innocent property owners. Any fresh denial of guilt made to government when questioned about committing a crime “even when you did not do the crime” may (involuntarily waive) a defendant’s right to assert in their defense—the “Criminal Statute of Limitations” has past for prosecution; any fresh denial of guilt even 30 years after a crime was committed may allow Government prosecutors to use old and new evidence, including information discovered during a Civil Asset Forfeiture Proceeding to launch a criminal prosecution. For that reason many innocent Americans, property and business owners are reluctant to defend their property and businesses against Government Civil Asset Forfeiture.

    Re: waiving Criminal Statute of Limitations: see USC18, Sec.1001, James Brogan V. United States. N0.96-1579. U.S. See paragraph (6) at:
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/96-1579.ZC1.html

  3. Is TSA a Potential Threat To Americans’ National Security?

    The Nazi Government randomly stopped, searched and delayed German Citizens boarding trains, buses driving and walking. Civilians deemed politically undesirable by the Nazi Government were repeatedly stopped by the military, searched and questioned—made late for work—causing targeted Citizens to lose their jobs. German Citizens placed on (Nazi Do Not Hire Lists) similar to U.S. Homeland Security’s No Hire Lists started in 2010—could not survive. The Nazis put alleged undesirables on Do Not Rent Lists and No Government Food Assistance lists. Expectantly: disparate Germans not allowed work or receive government food assistance committed minor crimes precipitating the Nazis sending them to forced labor camps—which many died. Had the Nazis had X-ray scanners, no doubt the Nazis would have repeatedly overexposed targeted Citizens at checkpoints causing e.g. political targets to become ill or die.

    How much harmful radiation is secretly transmitted into the bodies of Americans by U.S. Government and Police that covertly x-ray, without warrants private homes, Americans walking on the street; in their vehicles—repeated x-rays of “Persons of Interests.” A Corrupt U.S. Government /agency, police and their independent contractors without public oversight can too easily use X-ray scanners to harm or kill Americans that government deems undesirable—overdose them with radiation. Almost every week there are reports of police arrested e.g. selling drugs, taking bribes, planting evidence so it should be expected corrupt law enforcement will use covert x-ray scanners to harm Americans. Consider Government’s COINTELPRO operation that abused and targeted Americans because they exercised their 1st Amendment; consider Obama’s reported Kill List that can call for the assassination of Americans without evidence or trial.

    Many Americans are concerned TSA will several times a day, target and force x-ray searches on Americans deemed undesirable by government at highway and other transportation check points. After a while targeted and other Americans out of fear for their health would be afraid to travel, even to work.

Leave a Comment