Aug 21

See also:

- Collapsing Marses Dwarf BP Oil Blowout as Ecological Disaster: ‘An International Economic And Ecological Calamity Unequaled In History’

- Bolivia: Over 1 Million of Dead Fish and Thousands of Alligators, Turtles, Dolphins and Other River Wildlife are Floating Dead in Rivers


A 22-mile plume of droplets from BP’s Deepwater Horizon well in the Gulf of Mexico undermines claim that oil has degraded

bp-deepwater-horizon-oil-scientists-find-giant-22-mile-plume-of-droplets
Images taken during the descent of an underwater vehicle show oil droplets appearing at a depth of 1065-1300m. Photograph: Ho/AFP/Getty Images

Scientists have mapped a 22-mile plume of oil droplets from BP’s rogue well in the depths of the Gulf of Mexico, providing the strongest evidence yet of the fate of the crude that spewed into the sea for months.

The report offers the most authoritative challenge to date to White House assertions that most of the 5m barrels of oil that spewed into the Gulf is gone.

“These results indicate that efforts to book-keep where the oil went must now include this plume,” said Christopher Reddy one of the members of the team from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.

The report, which is published in the journal Science, also said the plume was very slow to break down by natural forces, increasing the likelihood that oil could have travelled long distances in the Gulf before it was degraded.

“Many people speculated that subsurface oil droplets were being easily degraded,” said Richard Camilli, the lead author of the paper. “Well we didn’t find that. We found it was still there.”

At the heart of the debate is the rate at which naturally occurring microbes have consumed the oil from the runaway well. Even by the White House estimates, about one quarter of the oil was siphoned away from the well, skimmed off the surface, or burned. But the White House, in a high-profile briefing, earlier this month suggested that microbes had eaten as much as 50% of the remaining oil.

The study reinforces earlier reports from research voyages led by scientists from the University of Georgia and Texas A&M University who detected the presence of deepwater plumes of oil.

But the authors argued that theirs was more authoritative as it is the first to be published in a major peer-reviewed journal since oil began pumping into the ocean from the broken well four months ago. The authors also noted their access to superior technology including one of the few underwater robots available outside the oil industry.

According to their findings the deepwater plume measures 22 miles long, 1.2 miles wide and 650 feet high.

The team took around 57,000 samples from the plume during a 10-day research voyage at the end of June. It found that the plume was not made up of pure oil but a combination of toxic oil compounds including benzene and xylene.

The study puts the White House and government scientific agencies in an increasingly awkward position after a high-profile announcement two weeks ago that the oil was broken down or had been cleaned up.

A team led by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) reported that just over a quarter of the 49m barrels of oil remained in the Gulf as a light sheen on the surface or degraded tar balls washing ashore.

It also raises new questions about the strategic decision taken by the Obama administration to use nearly 2m gallons of chemical dispersant Corexit to break up the oil, including some on the ocean floor 5,000 feet below the surface.

The administration faces further pushback today in a congressional hearing on the fate of the oil and the safety of seafood from the Gulf.

Ian MacDonald, an oceanographer at Florida State University, said the White House accounting for the oil is misleading and that only 10% of the oil that spewed into the Gulf has been removed from the ocean. Jane Lubchenco, the NOAA chief and herself a marine scientist, has stood by the government estimates.

Suzanne Goldenberg, US environment correspondent
Thursday 19 August 2010 19.00 BST

Source: The Guardian

Related articles:

- Matt Simmons Dies In An ‘Accidental Drowning’ At His Home

- Matthew Simmons: ‘We’ve Now Killed The Gulf Of Mexico’ (Flashback)

- Gulf Oil Blowout: Matt Simmons Was Right!

- Loop Current in the Gulf of Mexico Has Stalled From BP Oil Disaster! (!)

- Scientists: Evidence Of Gulf Oil And Dispersant Mix Making Its Way Into The Foodchain

- The Growing Health Crisis in the Gulf of Mexico:

Corexit also contain arsenic, cadmium, chromium, mercury, cyanide, and other heavy metals. Dispersing oil with it increases toxicity 11-fold ….

- EPA Whistleblower On Gulf Health Risk Cover-Up: ‘People Who Work Near Corexit Are Hemorrhaging Internally.’:

People who work near it are hemorrhaging internally. And that’s what dispersants are supposed to do.EPA now is taking the position that they really don’t know how dangerous it is, even though if you read the label, it tells you how dangerous it is. And, for example, in the Exxon Valdez case, people who worked with dispersants, most of them are dead now. The average death age is around fifty. It’s very dangerous, and it’s an economic-it’s an economic protector of BP, not an environmental protector of the public.

- Gulf of Mexico BP Oil Rig Blast: Safety Alarm Was Off

- And Now: BP Plans Deep-Water Drilling Off Libya

Rachel Maddow: The Gulf Of Mexico Déjà Vu (Must See!)

- Matt Simmons: BP Cap Is A Fraud – ‘It’s The Biggest Cover-Up We have Ever Seen’

- Gulf Of Mexico Water Sample EXPLODES! Other Samples Prove To Be Toxic

- Toxicologists: Corexit ‘Ruptures Red Blood Cells, Causes Internal Bleeding’, ‘Allows Crude Oil To Penetrate ‘Into The Cells’ and ‘Every Organ System’

- BP Oil Blowout: All States Along Gulf Of Mexico Affected By Slick

- U.S. Senate Traitors Block Investigative Power for Oil Spill Commission

- And Now: BP admits failing to use industry risk test at any of its deepwater wells in the US

- Warning To Gulf Volunteers: Almost Every Cleanup Worker From The 1989 Exxon Valdez Disaster Is Now Dead

- CNN: 1st Amendment, Free Press Suspended Near Gulf Disaster Area

- Gulf of Mexico Disaster: BP Slick Covers Dolphins and Whales

- BP burns rare sea turtles alive, blocks efforts to save them

- Matt Simmons: ‘We’re going to have to evacuate the gulf states.’

- US Scientist: Methane In Gulf ‘Astonishingly High’, As Much As 1 Million Times The Normal Level

- BP Plans To Dump All North Sea Assets In Dramatic Attempt To Cut Costs

- BP Blocking Media Access To Workers (Video)

- BP Official Admits to Damage BENEATH THE SEA FLOOR

- BP Buys Search Term ‘Oil Spill’ From Google

- BP CEO Tony Hayward sold £1.4 million of his shares weeks before Gulf blowout

- Goldman Sachs Sold 44% Of Its BP Stock 3 Weeks Before Gulf Blowout

- Feds and BP Withheld Videos Showing Massive Scope of Oil Spill

- Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Solution Restores Environment in Just Six Weeks

- BP’s ‘brilliant’ CEO Tony Hayward clashes with scientists over deep sea oil pollution

- Matt Simmons on Bloomberg: There Is A Much Larger Leak, Creating A Gigantic Plume; US Military Should Take Over And Use Nuclear Weapons to Seal The Blowout

- BP’s top kill effort fails to plug Gulf oil leak

- Gulf of Mexico Oil Apocalypse Creates Underwater Nightmare

- Gulf of Mexico clean-up boats recalled after crews suffer health problems

- Deepwater Horizon survivors were kept in seclusion after rig explosion, coerced into signing legal waivers

- SPECIAL REPORT: Civil fine in Gulf spill could be $4,300 a barrel

- Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Health Hazards

- Fishermen get severly ill from clean-up work in Gulf

- NASA Images Show Oil Entering Loop Current

- New NASA Image of Gulf Oil Moving Towards Atlantic Ocean

- Worry That Gulf Oil Spreading Into Major Ocean Current

- AP IMPACT: Fed’l Inspections on Rig Not as Claimed:

The federal agency responsible for ensuring that an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico was operating safely before it exploded last month fell well short of its own policy that inspections be done at least once per month, an Associated Press investigation shows.

Since January 2005, the federal Minerals Management Service conducted at least 16 fewer inspections aboard the Deepwater Horizon than it should have under the policy, a dramatic fall from the frequency of prior years, according to the agency’s records.

- Gulf of Mexico: Scientists Find Giant Plumes of Oil as Large as 10 Miles Long, 3 Miles Wide And 300 Feet Thick in Deep Waters:

Scientists studying video of the gushing oil well have tentatively calculated that it could be flowing at a rate of 25,000 to 80,000 barrels of oil a day. The latter figure would be 3.4 million gallons a day.

- Beyond Stupid: BP CEO Tony Hayward:

“The Gulf of Mexico is a very big ocean. The amount of volume of oil and dispersant we are putting into it is tiny in relation to the total water volume.”

- US Oil Spill: Scientists and Fishermen Alarmed Over Chemical Dispersants:

Approximately 325,000 gallons of dispersant have been deployed so far in BP’s effort to break up the spreading oil slick before it hits the fragile Gulf coast, and over 500,000 gallons more are available.

- Rig firm makes $270m profit from Gulf of Mexico oil spill

- US not accepting foreign help on oil spill

- Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill: New NOAA Projection Map; BP’s High-Stakes Mission; And More News

- Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill: The Halliburton Connection:

The company acknowledged Friday that it had completed the final cementing of the oil well and pipe just 20 hours before the blowout last week.

- US Oil Spill Disaster Is Now ‘Out Of Control’

Tags: , , , , , , ,

12 Responses to “Scientists Find Giant 22-Mile Plume Of Oil Droplets From BP’s Deepwater Horizon Well ‘Missed’ By Official Account”

  1. Has BP really cleaned up the Gulf oil spill? – Marcus Evans Offices Says:

    […] of the oil disaster put forward by the White House and other administration officials. Last May, her research team was the first to detect the presence of a vast plume of oil droplets swirling at h…. The discovery – initially disputed by government scientists – suggested that far more oil and […]

  2. Has BP really cleaned up the Gulf oil spill? | The Guardian Reader Says:

    […] of the oil disaster put forward by the White House and other administration officials. Last May, her research team was the first to detect the presence of a vast plume of oil droplets swirling at h…. The discovery – initially disputed by government scientists – suggested that far more oil and […]

  3. Has BP really cleaned up the Gulf oil spill? « Counter-Information Says:

    […] of the oil disaster put forward by the White House and other administration officials. Last May, her research team was the first to detect the presence of a vast plume of oil droplets swirling at h…. The discovery – initially disputed by government scientists – suggested that far more oil and […]

  4. Has BP Really Cleaned Up the Gulf Oil Spill? | Common Dreams | 2012 Indy Info Says:

    […] of the oil disaster put forward by the White House and other administration officials. Last May, her research team was the first to detect the presence of a vast plume of oil droplets swirling at h…. The discovery – initially disputed by government scientists – suggested that far more oil and […]

  5. Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Blog Samantha Joye 50% of Oil Floating Around | Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Blog Says:

    […] of the oil disaster put forward by the White House and other administration officials. Last May, her research team was the first to detect the presence of a vast plume of oil droplets swirling at h…. The discovery – initially disputed by government scientists – suggested that far more oil and […]

  6. USA: Deepwater Horizon – Alles wieder in Butter? « Ticker Says:

    […] of the oil disaster put forward by the White House and other administration officials. Last May, her research team was the first to detect the presence of a vast plume of oil droplets swirling at h…. The discovery – initially disputed by government scientists – suggested that far more […]

  7. Has BP really cleaned up the Gulf oil spill? « CRISISBOOM Says:

    […] of the oil disaster put forward by the White House and other administration officials. Last May, her research team was the first to detect the presence of a vast plume of oil droplets swirling at h…. The discovery – initially disputed by government scientists – suggested that far more oil and […]

  8. Has BP Really Cleaned Up The Oil? « Ann Novek–With the Sky as the Ceiling and the Heart Outdoors Says:

    […] of the oil disaster put forward by the White House and other administration officials. Last May, her research team was the first to detect the presence of a vast plume of oil droplets swirling at h…. The discovery – initially disputed by government scientists – suggested that far more oil and […]

  9. Has BP really cleaned up the Gulf oil spill? | Green Man Blog Says:

    […] of the oil disaster put forward by the White House and other administration officials. Last May, her research team was the first to detect the presence of a vast plume of oil droplets swirling at h…. The discovery – initially disputed by government scientists – suggested that far more oil and […]

  10. Deepwater Horizon, nearly one year on… | Pipe(line)Dreams Says:

    […] of the oil disaster put forward by the White House and other administration officials. Last May, her research team was the first to detect the presence of a vast plume of oil droplets swirling at h…. The discovery – initially disputed by government scientists – suggested that far more oil and […]

  11. Has BP really cleaned up the Gulf oil spill? | Product Sourcing - Industrial News Says:

    […] administration officials. Last May, her research team was the first to detect the presence of a vast plume of oil droplets swirling at high speed through the deep waters of the Gulf. The discovery – initially […]

  12. Has BP really cleaned up the Gulf oil spill? | Daily Manzar Namaa Says:

    […] of the oil disaster put forward by the White House and other administration officials. Last May, her research team was the first to detect the presence of a vast plume of oil droplets swirling at h…. The discovery – initially disputed by government scientists – suggested that far more oil and […]

Leave a Reply