And Now: One Of The World’s Most Dangerous Chemicals As Pesticide In Strawberry Fields

Dangerous new pesticide coming to the produce aisle:

Think strawberries are expensive now? Wait until they start costing people their lives!

California is about to sign off on an insane plan that would allow farmers to use one of the world’s most dangerous chemicals as a pesticide on strawberry plants.

It’s called methyl iodide, and even some chemists won’t go near it. It’s such a powerful and reliable carcinogen that researchers use it to induce cancer in lab animals.

But go ahead, take a bite. California says it’s OK — and never mind the five Nobel-winning chemists and dozens of other experts who’ve written a letter begging the EPA to keep this poison out of strawberry fields, forever.

Who do you believe — a roomful of Nobel winners and their trusted colleagues, or a bunch of politically motivated bureaucrats?

This toxic monster has been linked to thyroid tumors, nerve damage, and brain and lung problems. It’s also been known to cause miscarriages in lab animals — when it’s not being used to give them cancer.

No wonder it’s such a great pesticide — it can destroy just about anything. The pests don’t stand a chance… and neither do you if you get too close to this poison.

Experts say a good breeze can even send methyl iodide airborne… and if you think U.S. groundwater is bad now, wait until this junk starts seeping in.

And now compare this information to the following Los Angeles Times article …


methyl-iodide-strawberries
The Environmental Working Group, an advocacy group, ranks strawberries as one of the three worst fruits and vegetables with regard to pesticide exposure. (Peaches and celery are the other two.) (Los Angeles Times)

California strawberry farmers may soon have a new pesticide to use on their fields. The state’s Department of Pesticide Regulation is recommending approving use of the soil fumigant methyl iodide.

However, scientists say that methyl iodide is very toxic and can cause cancer, brain damage and miscarriages. An independent panel of scientists, invited to review the health risk data and safe exposure levels recommended for farmworkers and nearby communities, were shocked that the state is still moving toward approval and at higher levels of exposure than what the department’s scientists proposed.

Methyl iodide received approval from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2007, accompanied by a similar uproar. Fifty-four eminent academic scientists and physicians wrote a letter to the agency, urging them to prevent the chemical’s use.

In California, new pesticides must undergo an additional layer of review. As part of that review, risk assessment scientists within the Department of Pesticide Regulation settled on 0.8 parts per billion as an acceptable exposure level of methyl iodide. “We all thought that, if anything, it should be lower than that,” says Edward Loechler, a molecular biologist at Brandeis University in Boston who served on the scientific review panel.

Instead, the DPR risk managers have settled on 96 parts per billion – far more than the panel recommended, although still roughly half of the 193 ppb permitted by the EPA. “That’s not policy – that’s meddling with the science,” says panel member Dr. Paul Blanc, head of the occupational and environmental medicine division at UC San Francisco.

Pesticide reform groups are opposed to registration of the chemical for agricultural use. “The Pesticide Action Network has not objected to the registration of any new pesticide in the last 15 years – but methyl iodide is so toxic that it’s worth going to the mat on this one,” says chemist Susan Kegley, who consults for the organization. Usually, newer pesticides are less toxic than the old ones, she says.

In a statement, Department of Pesticide Regulation Director Mary-Ann Warmerdam said that, with the use restrictions her agency is recommending, which are more stringent that those of the EPA, “methyl iodide can be used safely.”

Here’s a closer look at the health effects of methyl iodide and who is at risk.

What is methyl iodide?

Methyl iodide, also called iodomethane, is a small, highly reactive chemical that kills a wide range of tiny animals, weeds and fungi that live in soil, many of which are detrimental to strawberry growth. The pesticide is applied to fields before planting and is so chemically reactive that it does not remain in the soil for long. More than half of the applied fumigant evaporates into the air, where it breaks down within 12 days; what remains in the soil also breaks down quickly, according to the EPA.

Methyl iodide was developed as an alternative to methyl bromide, which has similar pest-killing actions. However, agricultural use of methyl bromide is being slowly phased out because it lasts longer in the atmosphere (as long as two years) and contributes to depletion of the ozone layer.

Who is at risk?

The main people at risk of methyl iodide exposure are farmworkers – those who apply the chemical – and anybody who lives or works near treated fields.

There’s no methyl iodide risk in eating strawberries that were grown in treated fields, according to EPA and DPR assessments. Tests have shown that no residual methyl iodide exists on the fruit. (SURE!)

So strawberries are clear of pesticides?

Conventionally grown strawberries still contain residues of other pesticides. According to data collected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, as many as 54 pesticides have been found on American strawberries, although rarely at levels above what the EPA considers safe. The Environmental Working Group, an advocacy group, ranks strawberries as one of the three worst fruits and vegetables with regard to pesticide exposure. (Peaches and celery are the other two.)

What are the health risks with methyl iodide?

In animal studies, exposure to sufficient quantities of methyl iodide causes thyroid cancer, neurotoxicity and fetal death.

“We’re talking about an extremely reactive chemical that binds to key biological molecules, including – but not limited to – DNA,” Blanc says. “In fact, if you’re working in the laboratory and you want to modify DNA experimentally, methyl iodide is one of your chemicals of choice.”

Acute methyl iodide poisonings have been reported over the years, typically from mishandling the chemical in a laboratory or industrial setting. People suffer confusion, dizziness, loss of motor coordination and have developed persistent Parkinson’s-like symptoms, motor and sensory disturbances, and psychiatric syndromes.

However, these cases were usually one-time exposures to high doses of the chemical. It’s not clear how repeated exposure to much lower levels of methyl iodide might affect the farmworkers who work with the new pesticide. Neither are there animal studies on chronic, low-level exposure with the chemical.

Researchers who have studied health effects in workers who routinely use methyl bromide fumigants (but haven’t suffered an accidental poisoning) have reported elevated rates of neurological symptoms such as dizziness, numbness or burning sensations, headache and nausea, according to a review published in the Journal of Occupational Health in 2009.

Will state-mandated restrictions and safety precautions prevent exposure?

To apply methyl iodide, workers are required to wear respirators and protective clothing, and treated fields must be covered immediately with tarps. In addition, California will mandate lower maximum amounts that can be applied and wider buffer zones around treated fields than the EPA requires.

Kegley says these safety precautions are not enough to prevent dangerous exposure, citing a Pesticide Action Network report released last week. When scientists monitored the air in the town of Sisquoc, Calif., they found levels of another soil fumigant, chloropicrine, that were higher than what’s considered safe by the EPA and DPR. Something similar could easily happen with methyl iodide, she says. “Even if everything goes right, even if there’s no accidents, no torn tarps [or] people not able to understand the regulations, you still have a really good chance of exceeding the level of concerns set by the agency.”

Loechler sums up the choices this way: “Use methyl iodide and potentially risk workers’ and their families’ health; use methyl bromide and risk the ozone layer; or use neither and have strawberries be more expensive.”

California’s Department of Pesticide Regulation has not finalized its decision on methyl iodide and is accepting public comment through June 29 at mei_comments@cdpr.ca.gov.

By Jill U Adams, Special to the Los Angeles Times
June 28, 2010

Source: The Los Angeles Times

1 thought on “And Now: One Of The World’s Most Dangerous Chemicals As Pesticide In Strawberry Fields

  1. this is a total disgrace to accept the use of such a proven poison. Our society is in great need for ethics and respect that goes way beyond financial considerations.

Leave a Comment